Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Increased Efficacy and Safety of Enteral Nutrition Support with a Protocol (ASNET) in Noncritical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2018) |
Auteurs : | Luis Alfonso Ortiz-Reyes ; Lilia Castillo-Martinez ; Arianne Itzel Lupian-Angulo ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Journal of the academy of nutrition and dietetics (Vol. 118, n° 1, 2018) |
Article en page(s) : | 52-61 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Efficacité ; Nutrition entérale ; Protocole ; Soutien nutritionnel |
Résumé : |
Background
Unintentional underfeeding is common in patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN), and is associated with increased risk of malnutrition complications. Protocols for EN in critically ill patients have been shown to enhance adequacy, resulting in better clinical outcomes; however, outside of intensive care unit (ICU) settings, the influence of a protocol for EN is unknown. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of implementing an EN protocol in a noncritical setting. Design Randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants and settings This trial was conducted from 2014 to 2016 in 90 adult hospitalized patients (non-ICU) receiving exclusively EN. Patients with carcinomatosis, ICU admission, or Intervention The intervention group received EN according to a protocol, whereas the control group was fed according to standard practice. Main outcome measures The proportion of patients receiving ≥80% of their caloric target at Day 4 after EN initiation. Statistical analyses performed Student t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for continuous variables and the difference between the groups in the time to receipt of the optimal amount of nutrition was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results Forty-five patients were randomized to each group. At Day 4 after EN initiation, 61% of patients in the intervention arm had achieved the primary end point compared with 23% in the control group (P=0.001). In malnourished patients, 63% achieved the primary end point in the intervention group compared with 16% in the control group (P=0.003). The cumulative deficit on Day 4 was lower in the intervention arm compared with the control arm: 2,507 kcal (interquartile range [IQR]=1,262 to 2,908 kcal) vs 3,844 kcal (IQR=2,620 to 4,808 kcal) (P Conclusions Implementation of an EN protocol outside the ICU significantly improved the delivery of calories and protein when compared with current standard practice without increasing gastrointestinal complications. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267217316106 |
Exemplaires (1)
Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|
REV | Périodique papier | Woluwe | Espace revues | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |