Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Supporting prostate cancer survivors in primary care: Findings from a pilot trial of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention (PROSPECTIV) (2018) |
Auteurs : | Elia K. Watson ; Bethany Shinkins ; Lauren Matheson ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | European Journal of Oncology Nursing (Vol. 32, February 2018) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 73-81 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Efficacité ; Essai clinique ; Infirmières et infirmiers ; Soins de santé primaires ; Survivants ; Tumeurs de la prostate |
Mots-clés: | Faisabilité ; Essai contrôlé randomisé ; Étude pilote ; Intervention psychoéducative |
Résumé : |
Purpose
This study sought to test the acceptability and feasibility of a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention (NLPI) delivered in primary care to prostate cancer survivors, and to provide preliminary estimates of the effectiveness of the intervention. Methods Men who reported an ongoing problem with urinary, bowel, sexual or hormone-related functioning/vitality on a self-completion questionnaire were invited to participate. Participants were randomly assigned to the NLPI plus usual care, or to usual care alone. Recruitment and retention rates were assessed. Prostate-related quality of life, self-efficacy, unmet needs, and psychological morbidity were measured at baseline and 9 months. Health-care resource use data was also collected. An integrated qualitative study assessed experiences of the intervention. Results 61% eligible men (83/136) participated in the trial, with an 87% (72/83) completion rate. Interviews indicated that the intervention filled an important gap in care following treatment completion, helping men to self-manage, and improving their sense of well-being. However, only a small reduction in unmet needs and small improvement in self-efficacy was observed, and no difference in prostate-related quality of life or psychological morbidity. Patients receiving the NLPI recorded more primary care visits, while the usual care group recorded more secondary care visits. Most men (70%; (21/30)) felt the optimal time for the intervention was around the time of diagnosis/before the end of treatment. Conclusions Findings suggest a nurse-led psycho-educational intervention in primary care is feasible, acceptable and potentially useful to prostate cancer survivors. |
Disponible en ligne : | Non |
Exemplaires (1)
Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|
REV | Périodique papier | Woluwe | Espace revues | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |