Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Consumers responses to health claims in the context of other on-pack nutrition information: a systematic review (2017) |
Auteurs : | Zenobia Talati ; Simone Pettigrew ; Bruce Neal ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Nutrition reviews (vol.75, n° 4, 2017) |
Article en page(s) : | 260-273 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Allégation nutritionnelle et de santé ; Comportement ; Consommateur ; Etiquetage des aliments |
Résumé : | Context: The presence of health claims on food packaging can positively bias consumers evaluations of foods. Objective: This review examined whether cognitive biases endure when other sources of nutrition information [the nutrition facts panel (NFP) and front-of-pack labels] appear on-pack with health claims. Data sources: The following databases were searched: Web of Science, Ovid, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ProQuest, and Wiley Online Library. Study selection: The search terms (health claim* OR nutri* claim) AND (food label* OR front of pack) were used to identify studies. Data extraction: Twenty-four studies that examined health claims and front-of-pack labels or the NFP were included. Results: The NFP can reduce bias, but only if consumers view it and interpret it correctly, which often does not occur. Front-of-pack labels show greater promise in reducing bias created by health claims. Conclusions: These findings are relevant to policymakers who are considering the effectiveness of mandating an NFP and/or a front-of-pack label alongside health claims. |
Disponible en ligne : | Non |
Exemplaires (1)
Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|
REV | Périodique papier | Woluwe | Espace revues | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |