Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Monoclonal antibody-induced papulopustular rash: Clinical course, communication to health-care professionals and reactive measures as reported by patients (2016) |
Auteurs : | Sara Cignola ; Silvia Gonella ; Bin Alessandra ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | European Journal of Oncology Nursing (Vol. 20, February 2016) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 133-139 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Anticorps monoclonaux ; Communication ; Education thérapeutique ; Eruption ; Recherche ; Relations entre professionnels de santé et patients ; Soins infirmiers ; Tumeurs cutanées |
Résumé : |
Purpose
The primary end-point was to describe the clinical course of monoclonal antibody-induced papulopustular rash (mAB-induced PPR), when patients alert health-care providers and the subsequent reactive measures employed. Exploring the predictors affecting PPR grading was the secondary end-point. Methods A multicentre retrospective study involving six Italian oncology outpatient departments was conducted. Thirty-nine patients with cancer undergoing cetuximab or panitumumab treatment were included. Information was collected through medical records and face-to-face interviews. mAB-induced PPR was scored by patients' self-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Eventsv4.02 and was defined as severe when the grade ≥3. Results Thirty-five (89.7%) patients developed a rash, which was severe in nine cases. The rash usually appeared within the first week after starting the drug (22, 62.8%), peaked in severity during the first month (26, 74.3%) and resolved 48 weeks after the end of mABs therapy (15, 45.7%). At the time of the interviews, the rash was not still resolved in almost half (n = 16) of the patients. Twenty-six (74.3%) patients reported sequelae and the mostly common were erythema (21, 81%) and dry skin (14, 54%). Only half of the patients informed health-care professionals as soon as the rash appeared. All the patients treated the rash topically and mAB therapy was modified in 16 (45.7%) cases (reduction, n = 10; discontinuation, n = 9; withdrawal, n = 2). No association between male gender, age, fair skin, current smokers during therapy and PPR grading escalation was found. Conclusions The clinical course of the rash was pathognomonic. Patients should be further encouraged to communicate the onset of a rash to health-care professionals as soon as it appears to avoid grading escalation and sequelae. The adoption of CTCAE as a patient-reported outcome may become an instrument to help health-care providers in tailoring treatment measures. |
Disponible en ligne : | Non |
Exemplaires (1)
Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|
REV | Périodique papier | Woluwe | Espace revues | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |