Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Perceptions of healthcare professionals and students about interventions addressing implicit bias and microaggression : A mixed-studies systematic review (2023) |
Auteurs : | Noorhidayah Bte Noor Azman ; Teo Wei Zhou ; Shefaly Shorey |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 73, November 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | 103820 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103820 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Agressivité ; Elève infirmier ; Étudiants ; Perception ; Personnel de santé ; Préjugé ; Revue systématique |
Résumé : | Aim To consolidate and appraise available evidence on the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals and students about the interventions addressing implicit bias and microaggression in the clinical setting. Background Patient-perpetrated acts of implicit bias and microaggression have profound effects on healthcare professionals? and students? mental health. However, the efficacy of interventions targeted at addressing implicit bias and microaggression requires further scrutiny. Design Mixed-studies systematic review. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, ProQuest (Social Science Premium Collection Database), ProQuest (Dissertations and Theses Global), and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study selection, quality appraisal using the mixed methods appraisal tool, and data extraction were performed. Narrative and thematic synthesis were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative findings respectively. A results-based convergent approach was employed to integrate findings from both research designs. Results A total of 23 studies were included, involving 4667 healthcare professionals and students. There were 17 quantitative studies and six mixed-method studies of varying methodological quality. This review presented findings on healthcare professionals? and students? experiences and perceptions of the efficacy of the interventions targeted at addressing implicit bias and microaggression. Two themes were identified: 1) A safe space leading to enhanced confidence, and 2) what and why the interventions worked. Conclusion Our review findings found that healthcare professionals and students generally had a positive view of implicit bias and microaggression interventions in the realm of helping them gain knowledge and confidence to identify and respond to biased clinical encounters. This review could provide insights for administrators and institutions to provide such interventions in mitigating the impact of implicit bias and microaggression on healthcare staff and students. Future research should focus on comparing the views of participants from varied geographical and cultural backgrounds, and those with different healthcare disciplines. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595323002822 |