Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Interrater Reliability of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, Berg Balance Scale, and Functional Independence Measure Motor Domain in Individuals With Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxia (2023) |
Auteurs : | Sarah C. Milne ; Melissa Roberts ; Hannah L. Ross ; Amy Robinson ; Kristen Grove ; Gabrielle Modderman ; Shannon Williams ; Jillian Chua ; Alison C. Grootendorst ; Libby Massey ; David J. Szmulewicz ; Martin B. Delatycki ; Louise A. Corben |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 104, n° 10, 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1646-1651 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.05.003 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Ataxie ; Ataxies spinocérébelleuses ; Dégénérescences spinocérébelleuses ; Équilibre postural ; Évaluation des résultats des patients ; Examen neurologique ; Marche à pied ; Réadaptation ; Reproductibilité des résultats |
Résumé : | Objective To determine the interrater reliability of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and motor domain of the FIM (m-FIM) administered by physiotherapists in individuals with a hereditary cerebellar ataxia (HCA). Design Participants were assessed by 1 of 4 physiotherapists. Assessments were video-recorded and the remaining 3 physiotherapists scored the scales for each participant. Raters were blinded to each other's scores. Setting Assessments were administered at 3 clinical locations in separate states in Australia. Participants Twenty-one individuals (mean age=47.63 years; SD=18.42; 13 male and 8 female) living in the community with an HCA were recruited (N=21). Main Outcome Measures Total and single-item scores of the SARA, BBS, and m-FIM were examined. The m-FIM was conducted by interview. Results Intraclass coefficients (2,1) for the total scores of the m-FIM (0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.96), SARA (0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96), and BBS (0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) indicated excellent interrater reliability. However, there was inconsistent agreement with the individual items, with SARA item 5 (right side) and item 7 (both sides) demonstrating poor interrater reliability and items 1 and 2 demonstrating excellent reliability. Conclusions The m-FIM (by interview), SARA, and BBS have excellent interrater reliability for use when assessing individuals with an HCA. Physiotherapists could be considered for administration of the SARA in clinical trials. However, further work is required to improve the agreement of the single-item scores and to examine the other psychometric properties of these scales. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999323003362 |