Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | The effect of crossword puzzles on nursing students' learning of concepts related to pain management course: A randomized controlled trial (2023) |
Auteurs : | ?pek Köse Tosunöz ; Sevgi Deniz Do?an |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 71, August 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | 103740 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103740 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Apprentissage ; Elève infirmier ; Essais cliniques comme sujet ; Gestion de la douleur ; Matériel d'enseignement ; Mots croisés ; Soins infirmiers |
Résumé : | Background Nursing students encounter various terms and concepts during their undergraduate education. Repeating and reinforcing these terms and concepts is challenging. Active learning strategies are recommended to enhance students' effectiveness, productivity and interest in the learning process in undergraduate education. Aim This study aims to investigate the effect of crossword puzzles on nursing students' learning success and knowledge retention of the concepts related to the pain management course. Design The study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial. Settings The study was conducted in the nursing department of a state university in the southern region of Turkey. Participants The study involved 72 s-year nursing students who were enrolled in the Pain Management course. Methods Data were collected using a "Personal Information Form" and three different "Pain Management Knowledge Tests." While the control group received only the standard lecture technique as a traditional method, the experimental group was exposed to crossword puzzles as an active learning method for three lesson hours following the standard lecture technique. Research data were collected between November and December 2022 in the classroom. Descriptive statistics, the Independent Samples t-test, Repeated Measures ANOVA test and Pearson's chi-squared test were employed for data analysis. Results There was no significant difference between the pre-test and first post-test mean scores of both groups (p ? 0.05). However, the second post-test scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595323002020 |