Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Effect of respiratory muscle training in asthma : A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) |
Auteurs : | Ana Lista-Paz ; Lucía Bouza Cousillas ; Cristina Jácome ; Guilherme Fregonezi ; Noé Labata-Lezaun ; Luis Llurda-Almuzara ; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (Vol. 66, n° 3, April 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | 101691 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101691 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Asthme ; Exercices respiratoires ; Pressions respiratoires maximales ; Revue systématique ; Traitement par les exercices physiques |
Résumé : | Background The last systematic review about respiratory muscle training (RMT) in people with asthma was published almost 10 years ago. Since then, several works have been published. Objective To review the effect of RMT in people with asthma. Methods We conducted a systematic review of research included up to September 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies assessing the effect of RMT on respiratory muscle function, rescue medication, asthma-related symptoms, lung function, exercise capacity, healthcare use, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse effects in people with asthma. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool and the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis was performed whenever possible; otherwise a qualitative approach was followed. Results Eleven studies (270 participants) were included, 10 with only adults and were included in the meta-analysis. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) had beneficial effects on maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax: mean difference [MD] 21.95 cmH2O [95% confidence interval [CI] 15.05; 28.85]), with no changes in maximal expiratory pressure (MD 14.97 cmH2O [95%CI -5.65; 35.59]), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec: MD 0.06 [95%CI -0.14; 0.26] L; force vital capacity: MD 0.39 [95%CI -0.24; 1.02] L) and exercise capacity (standard mean difference [SMD] 1.73 [95%CI -0.61; 4.08]). Subgroup analysis revealed that IMT load >50% PImax and duration >6 weeks were beneficial for exercise capacity. The qualitative analysis suggested that IMT may have benefits on respiratory muscle endurance, rescue medication and exertional dyspnoea, with no adverse effects. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a significant increase in PImax after IMT in adults with asthma and reinforced the relevance of the dose?response principle of training. More evidence is needed to clarify the effect of IMT in respiratory muscle endurance, rescue medication, exercise capacity, healthcare use and HRQoL. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020221939; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=221939 |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572200063X |