Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Infection after prostatic transrectal fiducial marker implantation for image guided radiation therapy (2023) |
Auteurs : | T. Reynaud ; I. Ben Aicha ; D. Carignan ; C. Pelchat ; C. Fiset ; W. Foster ; A.-G. Martin ; E. Vigneault |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Cancer/Radiothérapie (Vol. 27, n° 3, Mai 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 214-218 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2022.10.005 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Antibactériens ; Imagerie diagnostique ; Infections ; Radiothérapie guidée par l'image ; Tumeurs de la prostate |
Mots-clés: | Quinolinone ; Marques de positionnement ; marqueurs fiduciels intraprostatiques |
Résumé : |
Purpose
The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the risk of infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Material and methods Between January 2016 and December 2020, 829 patients scheduled for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer had an intraprostatic fiducial marker transrectal implantation under ultrasound guidance by radiation-oncologists specialized in brachytherapy. Patients received standard oral prophylactic antibiotic with quinolone. If Gram negative bacteria resistant to quinolone were detected at the time of the prostate cancer biopsies, the antibioprophylaxis regimen was modified accordingly. The resistance to quinolone screening test was not repeated before fiducial marker insertion. Infectious complications were assessed with questionnaires at the time of CT-planning and medical record reviewed. Toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0. Results The median time between fiducial marker implantation and evaluation was 10 days (range: 0165 days). Four patients (0.48%) developed urinary tract infection related to the procedure, mostly with Gram-negative bacteria resistant to quinolone (75%). Three had a grade 2 infection, and one patient experienced a grade 3 urosepsis. The quinolone-resistance status was known for two patients (one positive and one negative) and was unknown for the other two patients prior to fiducial marker implantation. Conclusion Intraprostatic transrectal fiducial marker implantation for image-guided radiotherapy is well tolerated with a low rate of infection. With such a low rate of infection, there is no need to repeat the search of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to quinolone before fiducial marker implantation if it was done at the time of prostate biopsies. Optimal antibioprophylaxis should be adapted to the known status of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to quinolone. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1278321823000598 |