Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Practical RECIP: Visual assessment of response evaluation criteria In PSMA-PET 1.0[Compte rendu de Communication orale] (2023) |
Auteurs : | A. Gafita ; L. Djaileb ; I. Rauscher ; W.P. Fendler ; B. Hadaschik ; K. Herrmann ; J. Calais ; J. Czernin ; M. Rettig ; M. Eiber ; M. Weber ; M.R. Benz ; A. Farolfi |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Médecine nucléaire (Vol. 47, n°2, mars 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 41-42 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen |
Mots-clés: | Lu-PSMA ; PET response assessment |
Résumé : |
Introduction
To evaluate the accuracy of Response Evaluation Criteria In PSMA-Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 determined by visual reads of nuclear medicine physicians for response evaluation using PSMA-PET/CT in men with mCRPC treated with 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. Methods In total, 124 patients were included in this multicenter retrospective study. All patients received 177Lu-PSMA and underwent PSMA-PET/CT scans at baseline (bPET) and at 12 weeks (iPET). Five nuclear medicine specialists individually interpreted each pair of PSMA-PET/CT scans for responses in PSMA-positive total tumor volume (PSMA-VOL) assessed visually and for occurrence of new lesions. Responses in PSMA-VOL were also assessed quantitatively using semi-automatic segmentation software. Occurrence of new lesions was combined: 1) with visual responses in PSMA-VOL to determine visual RECIP; and 2) with quantitative responses in PSMA-VOL to determine quantitative RECIP. RECIP response classes were dichotomized for differentiation of clinically relevant progressive (PD) vs. non-progressive disease (nPD): RECIP-PD vs. RECIP-nPD. Primary outcome measure was the inter-reader reliability of visual RECIP and agreement between visual vs. quantitative RECIP (by Cohen's κ coefficient). Secondary outcome measure was the prognostic value of visual RECIP (by Cox regression) for overall survival (OS). Results Based on readers majority rule, 41/124 (33%) and 83/124 (67%) patients had visual RECIP-PD and RECIP-nPD, respectively. Agreement among readers in classifying visual RECIP-PD vs. RECIP-nPD was observed in 103 (83%) patients (excellent agreement: κ = 0.81). Agreement between visual vs. quantitative RECIP was observed in 118 (95%) patients (excellent agreement: κ = 0.89). OS was significantly shorter in men with visual RECIP-PD vs. RECIP-nPD (HR 2.55; 95%CI, 1.713.81; P Conclusion Visual RECIP demonstrated excellent inter-reader reliability and excellent agreement with quantitative RECIP calculated using semi-automatic segmentation software. Visual RECIP was prognostic for overall survival of men undergoing 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. RECIP 1.0 evaluated visually by nuclear medicine physicians can be used in practice and clinical trials for response evaluation using PSMA-PET/CT in men with mCRPC. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.em-premium.com/revue/mednuc/47/2 |