Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Circumstances of Falls During Sit-to-Stand Transfers in Older People: A Cohort Study of Video-Captured Falls in Long-Term Care (2023) |
Auteurs : | Vicki Komisar ; Kimberley S. van Schooten ; Olivia M.G. Aguiar ; Nataliya Shishov ; Stephen N. Robinovitch |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 104, n° 4, 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 533-540 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Activités de la vie quotidienne ; Chutes accidentelles ; Locomotion ; Phénomènes biomécaniques ; Soins de longue durée ; Vieillissement |
Résumé : | Objective To characterize the circumstances of falls during sit-to-stand transfers in long-term care (LTC), including the frequency, direction, stepping and grasping responses, and injury risk, based on video analysis of real-life falls. Design Cohort study. Setting LTC. Participants We analyzed video footage of 306 real-life falls by 183 LTC residents that occurred during sit-to-stand transfers, collected from 2007 to 2020. The mean age was 83.7 years (SD=9.0 years), and 93 were female (50.8%). Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures We used Generalized Estimating Equations to test for differences in the odds that a resident would fall at least once during the rising vs stabilization phases of sit-to-stand and to test the association between the phase of the transfer when the fall occurred (rising vs stabilization) and the following outcomes: (1) the initial fall direction; (2) the occurrence, number, and direction of stepping responses; (3) grasping of environmental supports; and (4) documented injury. Results Falls occurred twice as often in the rising phase than in the stabilization phase of the transfer (64.0% and 36.0%, respectively). Falls during rising were more often directed backward, while falls during stabilization were more likely to be sideways (odds ratio [OR]=1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.07-3.55). Falls during rising were more often accompanied by grasping responses, while falls during stabilization were more likely to elicit stepping responses (grasping: OR=0.30; 95% CI=0.14-0.64; stepping: OR=8.29; 95% CI=4.54-15.11). Injuries were more likely for falls during the stabilization phase than the rising phase of the transfer (OR=1.73; 95% CI=1.04-2.87). Conclusion Most falls during sit-to-stand transfers occurred from imbalance during the rising phase of the transfer. However, falls during the subsequent stabilization phase were more likely to cause injury. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999322017117 |