Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | A comparative study of indirect calorimetry and prediction equations in overweight and obese Chinese adults (2022) |
Auteurs : | Zhicui Yao ; Ying Xie ; Long Wang ; Chao Yan ; Hongzhen Du ; Huanyu Hu ; Zengning Li |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Nutrition clinique et métabolisme (Vol. 36, n°3, Septembre 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 190-196 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nupar.2022.04.001 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Calorimétrie indirecte ; Chine ; Métabolisme énergétique ; Obésité ; Surpoids |
Mots-clés: | Dépense énergétique de repos ; Équations prédictives |
Résumé : | Objectives To determine the resting energy expenditure (REE) in Chinese adults using indirect calorimetry (IC), and evaluate the validity of published predictive equations for estimating REE in overweight and obese subjects comparing to IC. Material and methods 181 subjects with different body mass index (BMI) were recruited. Body composition was determined by bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA). REE was measured by IC and estimated by 29 REE prediction equations to analyze the accuracy of REE prediction equations. Results For all participants combined, the Bernstein et al. and Bernestin et al. (BC) equations similarly predicted REE values between -4% and 8% (P>0.05) of measured REE. When participant data were stratified by sex, BMI, the accuracy of each regression equation is different. In male overweight and obese group, the highest accuracy of the Bernestin et al. (BC) was 65.5% and 70.4%. In female overweight and obese group, the highest accuracy of the Bernestin et al. (BC) and Bernestin et al. was 79.6% and 69.4%. Conclusion The Bernestin et al. (BC) was closest to IC in male overweight/obese and female overweight, and the Bernestin et al was closest to IC in female obese. However, because those equations have shown considerable variability, they should be used cautiously when estimating the individual REE. When the IC method cannot be used, the Bernestin et al. (BC) and Bernestin et al are more accurate. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0985056222000395 |