Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentine version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with chronic low back pain (2022) |
Auteurs : | Federico Mignone ; Melina Calvo Delfino ; Juan Cruz Porollan ; Camila Macarena Graef ; Matias De la Rúa ; Santiago Soliño ; Gabriel Novoa ; Sandra Salzberg ; Ignacio Agustín Raguzzi ; Guadalupe De Ilzarbe ; Constanza Rubiera Vicente ; Juan Sebastian Vera Amor ; Tomás Vuoto ; Andrés Pierobon |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (Vol. 62, December 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | 102617 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102617 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Douleur chronique ; Lombalgie ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) |
Mots-clés: | Échelle de catastrophisation de la douleur |
Résumé : | Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Higher levels of catastrophizing were found in patients with LBP and this variable is associated with self-reported disability. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses catastrophizing in the presence of pain. Currently, an Argentine version of the PCS is not available. Objective To translate and cross-culturally adapt the PCS into Argentine Spanish and test the psychometric properties of the new version with chronic LBP patients. Study design Study of diagnostic accuracy/assessment scale. Methods The study was carried out in three consecutive phases following the COSMIN guidelines: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation. We included Argentine residents over 18 years with chronic LBP. We used the PCS and the Global rating of change (GROC) to assess the psychometric properties. Results No difficulties were present in the translation processes and the PCS-Arg was developed. The alfa Cronbach coefficient was 0.89. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change were 5.4 and 15.1 points, respectively. In the explanatory factorial analysis 3 components were identified. For the construct validity, the correlation between the PCS-Arg and disability and pain were r = 0.35 and rho = 0.04, respectively. The mean PCS score was 29.9. The lowest and highest scores were 3 and 52 points, therefore, no roof or ceiling effects of the total score were observed. Conclusion The PCS-Arg is a viable, reliable and valid tool for the assessment of catastrophizing in patients with chronic LBP. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781222001175 |