Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | The nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire for nursing students: A psychometric evaluation study (2022) |
Auteurs : | Esperanza Zuriguel-Pérez ; María-Teresa Lluch-Canut ; Montserrat Puig-Llobet ; Luis Basco-Prado ; Adrià Almazor-Sirvent ; Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido ; Mariela Patricia Aguayo-González ; Olga Mestres-Soler ; Juan Roldán-Merino |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 65, November 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | 103498 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103498 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Elève infirmier ; Enseignement spécialisé en soins infirmiers ; Psychométrie ; Sens critique |
Résumé : | Aim To adapt and validate the N-CT-4 Practice for use with Spanish nursing students. Background Promoting critical thinking is one of the primary objectives of nursing education programs all over the world. Using reliable and valid instruments to measure critical thinking is essential. The Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire (N-CT-4 Practice) is used internationally to assess critical thinking in nursing practice. However, little is known about the possible applications of this instrument in the context of nursing education. Methods Two-phase study: Phase I, adaptation of the N-CT-4 Practice for use with nursing students and verification of its content validity; phase 2, cross-sectional study to validate its psychometric properties in a sample of 331 nursing students from three university nursing schools. A subsample of 34 students completed the questionnaire on two occasions, with a time interval of two weeks. The construct validity and reliability of the instrument were tested using confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability. The STROBE guidelines and the COSMIN checklist were followed. Results All items obtained optimal content validity values. The model fit indices obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesis of the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire was based. Cronbach's alpha of 0.96 indicated high reliability. The correlations between the total score and the scores for the dimensions were statistically significant, positive and high, with values above r = 0.78 (p |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595322002128 |