Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Evaluating a Food Pantry ? Based Intervention to Improve Food Security, Dietary Intake, and Quality in Midwestern Food Pantries (2022) |
Auteurs : | Heather A. Eicher-Miller ; Breanne N. Wright ; Janet A. Tooze ; Bruce A. Craig ; Yibin Liu ; Regan L. Bailey ; Lacey A. McCormack ; Suzanne Stluka ; Lisa Franzen-Castle ; Becky Henne ; Donna Mehrle ; Dan Remley |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Journal of the academy of nutrition and dietetics (Vol. 122, n°11, November 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 2060-2071 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Assistance alimentaire ; Insécurité alimentaire ; Qualité alimentaire |
Mots-clés: | Aide alimentaire d'urgence ; Healthy Eating Index ; garde-manger |
Résumé : | Background Voices for Food was a longitudinal community, food pantry?based intervention informed by the social ecological model, and designed to improve food security, dietary intake, and quality among clients, which was carried out in 24 rural food pantries across 6 Midwestern states. Objective Our objective was to evaluate changes in adult food security, dietary intake, and quality from baseline (2014) to follow-up (2016), and to assess the role of adult food security on dietary outcomes. Design A multistate, longitudinal, quasi-experimental intervention with matched treatment and comparison design was used to evaluate treatment vs comparison group changes over time and changes in both groups over time. Participants/setting Adult food pantry clients (n = 617) completed a demographic food security survey, and up to three 24-hour dietary recalls at baseline (n = 590) and follow-up (n = 160). Intervention Community coaching served as the experimental component, which only ?treatment? communities received, and a food council guide and food pantry toolkit were provided to both ?treatment? and matched ?comparison? communities. Main outcome measures Change in adult food security status, mean usual intakes of nutrients and food groups, and Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores were the main outcome measures. Statistical analyses performed Linear mixed models estimated changes in outcomes by intervention group and by adult food security status over time. Results Improvements in adult food security score (?0.7 + 0.3; P = .01), Healthy Eating Index-2010 total score (4.2 + 1.1; P |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267222001083 |