Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Discrepancies Between Australian Eating Disorder Clinicians and Consumers Regarding Essential Components of Dietetic Treatment (2022) |
Auteurs : | Caitlin M. McMaster ; Tracey Wade ; Janet Franklin ; Susan Hart |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Journal of the academy of nutrition and dietetics (Vol. 122, n°8, August 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1543-1557 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.12.006 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Australie ; Consensus ; Diététique ; Orientation vers un spécialiste ; Troubles de l'alimentation |
Mots-clés: | Nutritionniste ; Technique Delphi ; Ambulatoire |
Résumé : | Background A recent Delphi study indicated that, compared with eating disorder (ED) consumers and carers, ED specialists were less likely to endorse involvement of a dietitian as a standard component of treatment. In addition, there was disagreement between these groups regarding the inclusion of a number of components of dietetic treatment. Objective This study aimed to further investigate these data to identify areas of disagreement among ED specialist dietitians, ED specialist non?dietetic clinicians, consumers, and carers with regard to outpatient dietetic treatment. Design and participants/setting The ED specialists panel from a previous Delphi study was recoded into 2 panels: ED specialist dietitians (n = 31) and ED specialist non?dietetic clinicians (n = 48) to compare responses of these panels with responses from consumers (n = 32) and carers (n = 23). Main outcome measures Statements in 7 categories relating to referral to dietitian, essential components of outpatient dietetic treatment regarding 4 ED patient populations, strategies to promote multidisciplinary collaboration, and skills dietitians should possess if treating patients with an ED were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis performed One-way analysis of variance was conducted with post-hoc multiple comparisons to compare mean statement ratings. Results Thirty-seven statements (30%) showed statistically significant differences (P |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267221015409 |