Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Characteristics of return to running programs following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A scoping review of 64 studies with clinical perspectives (2022) |
Auteurs : | Joachim Van cant ; Benoît Pairot de Fontenay ; Charbel Douaihy ; Alexandre Rambaud ; Alexandre Rambaud |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (Vol. 57, September 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 61-70 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.07.006 |
Langues: | Français |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Course à pied ; Réadaptation ; Reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur ; Retour au sport |
Résumé : | Objective To (1) describe return to running (RTR) programs used during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); and (2) provide clinical guidelines for RTR program after ACLR. Design Scoping review. Literature search We searched the MEDLINE (Pubmed), EMBASE, Web of Science and PEDro databases. Study selection criteria We included randomized controlled trial (RCT), cases series, meta-analyses, both scoping and systematic reviews including a rehabilitation program after ACLR with a specific RTR program. A ?Running program checklist? (RPC) was elaborated based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR), and on the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist. Data synthesis The percentage and number of studies specifying each of the running program checklist items in their RTR program were reported. Number of items reported in each study and specific analysis item-by-item were also proposed. Results The ?When (2)" item was the most frequently found (92.19%) and, conversely, the ?Who (1)" item appeared only in four studies (6.2%). One-third of the studies presented only one item of the RPC, and 48 of the 64 articles discussed less than three items. Two studies described in detail their RTR program by reporting 8 and 9 items out of the 10, respectively. No study presented 10 of the PRC items. Conclusion There is a serious lack of information concerning RTR program following ACLR in the literature and further studies are needed to establish a program based on the best evidence. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X22000980 |