Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Multimodal Ambulatory Monitoring of Daily Activity and Health-Related Symptoms in Community-Dwelling Survivors of Stroke: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Validity (2022) |
Auteurs : | Stephen C.L. Lau ; Stephen C.L. Lau ; Lisa Tabor Connor ; Carolyn M. Baum ; Carolyn M. Baum |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 103, n° 10, 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1992-2000 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.002 |
Langues: | Français |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Accélérométrie ; Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ; Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Évaluation écologique instantanée (EMA) ; Réadaptation ; Télémédecine |
Résumé : | Objective To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring, which combines accelerometry with ecological momentary assessment (EMA), to assess daily activity and health-related symptoms among survivors of stroke. Design Prospective cohort study involving 7 days of ambulatory monitoring; participants completed 8 daily EMA surveys about daily activity and symptoms (mood, cognitive complaints, fatigue, pain) while wearing an accelerometer. Participants also completed retrospective assessments and an acceptability questionnaire. Setting Community. Participants Forty survivors of stroke (N=40). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Feasibility was determined using attrition rate and compliance. Acceptability was reported using the acceptability questionnaire. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by the correlations between ambulatory monitoring and retrospective self-reports. Criterion validity was determined by the concordance between accelerometer-measured and EMA-reported daily activity. Results All participants completed the study (attrition rate=0%). EMA and accelerometer compliance were 93.6 % and 99.7%, respectively. Participants rated their experience with multimodal ambulatory monitoring positively. They were highly satisfied (mean, 4.8/5) and confident (mean, 4.7/5) in using ambulatory monitoring and preferred it over traditional retrospective assessments (mean, 4.7/5). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring estimates correlated with retrospective self-reports of the same and opposing constructs in the predicted directions (r=?0.66 to 0.72, P<.05 more intense accelerometer-measured physical activity was observed when participants reported doing physically demanding activities and vice versa. conclusions findings support the feasibility acceptability validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring in survivors mild stroke. has potential to provide a complete understanding daily context everyday life.> |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999322004841 |