Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Sports injury prevention programmes from the sports physical therapist's perspective: An international expert Delphi approach (2022) |
Auteurs : | Luciana De Michelis Mendonça ; Joke Schuermans ; Sander Denolf ; Christopher Napier ; Natalia F.N. Bittencourt ; Andrés Romanuk ; Igor Tak ; Kristian Thorborg ; Mario Bizzini ; Carlo Ramponi ; Colin Paterson ; Martin Hägglund ; Laurent Malisoux ; Wesam Saleh A. Al Attar ; Mina Samukawa ; Ernest Esteve ; Ummkulthoum Bakare ; Maria Constantinou ; Erik Witvrouw |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (Vol. 55, May 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 146-154 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.04.002 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Consensus ; Kinésithérapie (spécialité) ; Traumatismes sportifs |
Résumé : |
Objective
To provide consensus on how to plan, organize and implement exercise-based injury prevention program (IPP) in sports. Design Delphi. Setting LimeSurvey platform. Participants Experienced sports physical therapists from the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy member countries. Main outcome measures Factors related to sports IPP planning, organization and implementation. Results We included 305 participants from 32 countries. IPP planning should be based on an athlete's injury history, on pre-season screening results, and on injury rates (respectively, 98%, 92%, 89% agreement). In total 97% participants agreed that IPP organization should depend on the athlete's age, 93% on the competition level, and 93% on the availability of low-cost materials. It was agreed that IPP should mainly be implemented in warm-up sessions delivered by the head or strength/conditioning coach, with physical training sessions and individual physical therapy sessions (respectively, 94%, 92%, 90% agreement). Conclusion Strong consensus was reached on (1) IPP based on the athlete's injury history, pre-season screening and evidence-based sports-specific injury rates; (2) IPP organization based on the athlete's age, competition level, and the availability of low-cost materials and (3) IPP implementation focussing on warm-up sessions implemented by the strength/conditioning coach, and/or individual prevention sessions by the physical therapist. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X22000529#! |