Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Spoken narrative comprehension for young adult listeners: effects of competing voices and noise (2021) |
Auteurs : | Peter A. Wasiuk ; Gabriel A. Radvansky ; Robert L. Greene ; Lauren Calandruccio |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | International Journal of Audiology IJA (Vol. 60, n°9, Septembre 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 711-722 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1878397 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Bruit de fond ; Compréhension verbale ; Jeune adulte (19-24 ans) ; Mémoire |
Résumé : |
Objective
To examine the influence of competing voices or noise on the comprehension of spoken narratives for young adults. Design First, an intelligibility assessment of the target narratives was conducted to establish a signal-to-noise ratio ensuring accurate initial speech recognition. Then, narrative comprehension for two target types (fixed and varied target talker) was measured in four listening conditions (quiet, one-talker speech, speech babble, speech-shaped noise). After hearing target narratives in each listening condition, participants completed a visual recognition memory task that assessed the comprehension of the narrative materials at three levels of representation (surface form, propositional, event model). Study Sample Seventy adults (1832 years of age). Results Narrative comprehension results revealed a main effect of listening condition at the event model level, indicating poorer narrative memory of described situations for all noise conditions compared to quiet. Increased positive responses to thematically consistent but situationally wrong memory probes drove this effect. No other significant effects were observed. Conclusion Despite near-perfect speech recognition, background noise negatively influenced aspects of spoken narrative comprehension and memory. Specifically, noise did not disrupt memory for what was said (surface form and propositional memory), but only memory for what was talked about (event model memory). |
Accès : | Contactez la bibliothèque d'Ixelles si le lien vers la ressource électronique ne fonctionne plus |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14992027.2021.1878397 |