Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Differences in Dietary Quality by Sexual Orientation and Sex in the United States: NHANES 2011-2016 (2022) |
Auteurs : | Carmen E. Prestemon ; Anna H. Grummon ; Pasquale E. Rummo ; Lindsey Smith Taillie |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Journal of the academy of nutrition and dietetics (Vol. 122, n°5, May 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 918-931.e7 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.12.005 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Disparités d'accès aux soins ; Disparités de l'état de santé ; Maladie chronique ; Minorités sexuelles ; Obésité |
Mots-clés: | Healthy Eating Index |
Résumé : | Background There are persistent disparities in weight- and diet-related diseases by sexual orientation. Lesbian and bisexual females have a higher risk of obesity and cardiovascular disease compared with heterosexual females. Gay and bisexual males have a higher risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease compared with heterosexual males. However, it remains unknown how sexual orientation groups differ in their dietary quality. Objective This study aimed to determine whether dietary quality differs by sexual orientation and sex among US adults. Design This was a cross-sectional study of 24-hour dietary recall data from a nationally representative sample of adults aged 20 through 65 years participating in the 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants/setting Study participants were adults (n = 8,851) with complete information on dietary intake, sexual orientation, and sex. Main outcome measures The main outcome measures were daily energy intake from 20 specific food and beverage groups and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) scores for sexual orientation groups (heterosexual vs gay/lesbian/bisexual). Statistical analyses performed Ordinary least squares regressions were used to calculate adjusted means for each food and beverage group and HEI-2015, stratified by sex and controlling for covariates (eg, age and race/ethnicity) and survey cycles (2011-2012, 2013-2014, and 2015-2016). Results Among males, red and processed meat/poultry/seafood (P = .01) and sandwiches (P = .02) were smaller contributors to energy intake for gay/bisexual males compared with heterosexual males. Among females, cereals (P =.04) and mixed dishes (P = .02) were smaller contributors to energy intake for lesbian/bisexual females compared with heterosexual females. Gay/bisexual males had significantly higher total HEI-2015 scores than heterosexual males (mean + standard deviation 53.40 + 1.36 vs 49.29 + 0.32, difference = 4.14; P = .004). Lesbian/bisexual females did not differ in total or component HEI-2015 scores from heterosexual females. Conclusions Although gay/lesbian/bisexual groups were similar for a variety of dietary outcomes compared with heterosexual groups, gay and bisexual men displayed healthier dietary quality for processed meat (by consuming smaller amounts) and overall dietary quality (according to HEI-2015) compared with heterosexual males. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267221015392 |