Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Reliability Validity and Responsiveness of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure 4th Version in a Multicultural Setup (2022) |
Auteurs : | Amiram Catz ; Malka Itzkovich ; Keren Elkayam ; Dianne Michaeli ; Ilana Gelernter ; Yoav Benjamini ; Harvinder Singh Chhabra ; Luigi Tesio ; Einat Engel-Haber ; Emiliana Bizzarini ; Claudio Pilati ; Giulio Del Popolo ; Ilaria Baroncini ; Nan Liu ; Paulo Margalho ; Thabata Pasquini Soeira ; Bobeena Chandy ; Vadim Bluvshtein |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 103, n° 3, 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 430-440.e1 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.811 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Culture ; Diversité culturelle ; Poids et mesures ; Réadaptation ; Reproductibilité des résultats ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
Résumé : |
Objective
To examine the fourth version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure for reliability and validity. Design Partly blinded comparison with the criterion standard Spinal Cord Independence Measure III, and between examiners and examinations. Setting A multicultural cohort from 19 spinal cord injury units in 11 countries. Participants A total of 648 patients with spinal cord injury. Intervention Assessment with Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM IV) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) on admission to inpatient rehabilitation and before discharge. Main outcome measures SCIM IV interrater reliability, internal consistency, correlation with and difference from SCIM III, and responsiveness. Results Total agreement between examiners was above 80% on most SCIM IV tasks. All Kappa coefficients were above 0.70 and statistically significant (P<.001 pearson coefficients of the correlation between examiners were above and intraclass cronbach alpha was for entire scim iv subscales usually decreased when an item eliminated. reliability values lower subscale respiration sphincter management on admission than at discharge. iii mean very close them responsiveness not significantly different from that in most comparisons.> Conclusions The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SCIM IV, which was adjusted to assess specific patient conditions or situations that SCIM III does not address, and which includes more accurate definitions of certain scoring criteria, are very good and quite similar to those of SCIM III. SCIM IV can be used for clinical and research trials, including international multi-center studies, and its group scores can be compared with those of SCIM III. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999321014234#! |