Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | The effects of using virtual patients on the history-taking ability of nursing interns: A non-randomized controlled study (2022) |
Auteurs : | Juanjuan Zhao ; Huan He ; Jingrong Du ; Yuan Liu ; Zekai Li ; Liming You ; Kun Li |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 59, February 2022) |
Article en page(s) : | 7 p. |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103289 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Recueil de l'anamnèse ; Simulation sur patients standardisés |
Mots-clés: | Internes en soins infirmiers ; Étude contrôlée non randomisée |
Résumé : | Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the SYSU-NEP virtual patients (VPs) on the history-taking ability and self-efficacy of nursing interns. Background An easy to use, freely accessible and objective training software program on WeChat named Sun Yat-sen University Nursing Education Platform (SYSU-NEP) was developed to help nursing students improve their history-taking skills. Design This was a non-randomized controlled study. Methods A total of 90 nursing interns (44 in the intervention group and 46 in the control group), who practiced in internal medicine departments at a single teaching hospital, were recruited between July 2017 and December 2018. The data collected comprised demographic and academic data, Nursing History-taking Assessment Scale (NHTAS) and Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) scores. The chi-square test, t test and Wilcoxon test were used to test the differences in the variables between the two groups. The t test or Wilcoxon test was used to compare the differences between pre-intervention and post-intervention NHTAS and ASES scores in each group and to compare the changes (post-intervention ? pre-intervention) in NHTAS and ASES scores between the control and intervention groups. Results Both the control and intervention groups had higher post-intervention NHTAS scores compared with their pre-intervention scores (control group: 83.50 VS 61.00, P |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595322000038 |