Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Capturing PROMs in Oncology Through Consistent Nutrition Risk Identification: An Opportunity to Optimize Care by Embedding Patient Participation Facilitated by eHealth Tools (2021) |
Auteurs : | Susana Couto Irving |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics (Vol. 1, n° 3, 2021, October 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | p.103-104 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1159/000519081 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Évaluation des résultats des patients ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Nutrition ; Télémédecine ; Tumeurs |
Mots-clés: | Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) ; Évaluation globale subjective générée par le patient ; Distress thermometer |
Résumé : | Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study). Background: E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutrition status and distress status in cancer patients while facilitating treatment and encouraging patient participation. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptability, accuracy, and clinical utility of PROMs collected via E-Health tools among patients undergoing treatment for stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic tumors. Results: Eight-nine percent mostly, or completely, agreed that PROMs via tablets should be integrated in routine clinical care. Men were significantly more likely to require help completing the questionnaires than women (inv.OR = 0.51, 95% CI = (0.27, 0.95), p = 0.035). The level of help needed increased by 3% with each 1-year increase in age (inv. OR = 1.03, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.06), p = 0.013). On average, a patient tended to declare weight which was 0.84 kg inferior to their true weight (Bland and Altman 95 % CI = (3.9, 5.6); SD: 2.41) and a height which was 0.95 cm superior to their true height (Bland and Altman 95 % CI = (−5, 3.1); SD 2.08). Patient-reported nutrition status was significantly associated with the professionally generated assessment (95% CI = (2.27, 4.15), p |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/519081 |