Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Postural Control Performance on the Functional Reach Test: Validity of the Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) Criteria (2021) |
Auteurs : | Rosalee M. Dewar ; Kylie Tucker ; Andrew P. Claus ; Robert S. Ware ; Leanne M. Johnston |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 102, n° 6, 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1170-1179 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.018 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Enfant (6-12 ans) ; Équilibre postural ; Paralysie cérébrale ; Réadaptation |
Résumé : |
Objective
Evaluate the validity of the Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) clinical criteria for the Functional Reach Test (FRT) forward and lateral with laboratory measures of postural control in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Design Psychometric study of face, concurrent, and content validity. Setting Clinical laboratory. Participants Children (N=58) aged 7-18 years (ambulant CP n=17, typically developing [TD] n=41). Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Stability limits in standing were assessed using the Kids-BESTest items for FRT forwards (FRTFORWARD), FRT lateral preferred (FRTLATERAL(P)), and FRT lateral nonpreferred (FRTLATERAL(NP)). Force platforms and kinematic markers were used to collect information on center of pressure (CoP) and joint movement during reach. Analyses included face validity (Kids-BESTest scores compared between CP and TD groups), concurrent validity (agreement between Kids-BESTest scores and digitally derived scores), and content validity (relations between Kids-BESTest scores with kinematic and CoP data). Results Face validity of Kids-BESTest criteria was demonstrated with lower scores for CP compared to TD groups for FRTFORWARD (P<.001 and frtlateral equal scores for concurrent validity agreement between kids-bestest digitally derived was good to excellent p frtforward both groups. content the cp group were correlated with cop-rangeforward during cop-rangelateral kinematic data correlations moderate-high range of hip flexion ankle plantar trunk lateral> Conclusion The FRTFORWARD demonstrated face, concurrent, and content validity. The FRTLATERAL(P/NP) demonstrated concurrent validity, but partial face and content validity. To improve validity of Kids-BESTest FRT criteria, additional descriptors have been added under the scoring criteria to enable clinicians to quantify observed reach strategies. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999321000861#! |