Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy patient reported-outcome measure (VISA-G.BR) (2021) |
Auteurs : | Edson Barreto Paiva ; Daniel Camara Azevedo ; André Lourenço Pereira ; Alessandra N. Garcia ; Marco Antonio Percope de Andrade |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (Vol. 52, April 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1-6 |
Note générale : | doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102341 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Enquêtes et questionnaires ; Hanche ; Instrument de mesure |
Mots-clés: | Douleur du grand trochanter ; VISA-G |
Résumé : |
Background:
Different outcome measures can be used to assess pain and disability in individuals with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS), including the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for Gluteal Tendinopathy (VISA-G), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and Global Perceived Effect (GPE). Objective: To translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate VISA-G to Brazilian Portuguese and to evaluate the measurement properties of the VISA-G.BR, ODI, GPE, and PSFS in individuals with GTPS. Design: This is a longitudinal clinimetric study. Methods: Sixty-eight individuals with GTPS participated in this study. The questionnaires VISA-G.BR, ODI, PSFS, and GPE were administered to participants at the initial assessment, 2448 h and 30 days after the initial assessment. Internal consistency and construct validity for the VISA-G.BR were assessed. Reliability, agreement, ceiling and floor effect, and responsiveness were described for all instruments. Results: The Cronbach Alpha for internal consistency value for VISA-G.BR was 0.65. The construct validity analysis showed a strong correlation value between ODI and VISA-G.BR (r = −0.77). The agreement analysis performed for all questionnaires showed standard error of measurement values ranging from 0.64 (PSFS) to 4.2 (VISA-G.BR). GPE scale had a floor effect. The responsiveness analysis performed for all questionnaires showed low values of effect size ranging from −0.07 to 0.3. Conclusion: The VISA-G.BR is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the disability of individuals with GTPS. The ODI and PSFS instruments can also be used in the evaluation of this population. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781221000254 |