Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Interrater Reliability Across 7 Established Risk Stratification Protocols in Cardiac Rehabilitation (2021) |
Auteurs : | Maria Isabela Ramos Haddad ; Ana Laura Ricci-Vitor ; Lais Manata Vanzella ; Anne Kastellianne França da Silva ; Carolina Takahashi ; Felipe Ribeiro ; Paula Fernanda da Silva ; Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 102, n° 3, 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 470-479 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.020 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Maladies cardiovasculaires ; Réadaptation ; Réadaptation cardiaque |
Résumé : |
Objective
To analyze the interrater agreement among physiotherapists in using 7 risk stratification (RS) protocols to evaluate participants of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and the main factors associated with disagreements that emerged during the RS process. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting Outpatient rehabilitation center. Participants Patients (N=72) enrolled in CR with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors. Mean age was 65.62±12.14 y, and mean body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 29.18±4.56. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome was to the agreement between 2 physiotherapists in the patients RS process, using 7 protocols established in the literature for use in CR: American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, American College of Sports Medicine, American Heart Association, Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, Sociedad Española de Cardiología, and Société Française de Cardiologie. In addition, the main disagreement factors were assessed. Results Interrater agreement was classified as moderate-to-good in the 7 included RS protocols (kappa index between 0.53-0.76). The most important aspects that led to disagreement between physiotherapists were reported in 5 categories. The protocol with the greater agreement index was the American College of Sports Medicine (93.10%; n=67), and the one with the greater disagreement was the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (27.80%; n=20). Conclusions Moderate-to-good interrater agreement among physiotherapists in using 7 RS protocols was observed. Major disagreements were the definition of abnormal hemodynamic responses, rhythm disorders, left ventricular dysfunction, and interpretation of the patients clinical characteristics. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999320309667#! |