Predictive Accuracy of Wideband Absorbance at Ambi... Catalogue en ligne

Bibliothèques HE Vinci

Predictive Accuracy of Wideband Absorbance at Ambient and Tympanometric Peak Pressure Conditions in Identifying Children with Surgically Confirmed Otitis Media with Effusion / Venkatesh Aithal in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol.31, n° 7 (July/August 2020)

[article]
inJournal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) > Vol.31, n° 7 (July/August 2020) . - p. 471-484

Titre :	Predictive Accuracy of Wideband Absorbance at Ambient and Tympanometric Peak Pressure Conditions in Identifying Children with Surgically Confirmed Otitis Media with Effusion
Type de document :	Article
Auteurs :	Venkatesh Aithal ; Sreedevi Aithal ; Joseph Kei ; Shane Anderson ; David Wright
Année de publication :	2020
Article en page(s) :	p. 471-484
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Descripteurs :	HE Vinci Enfant (6-12 ans) ; Oreille moyenne ; Otite ; Pression ; Tympanométrie ; Wideband absorbance (WBA) Autres descripteurs Test de performance
Résumé :	Background Wideband absorbance (WBA) measured at ambient pressure (WBAA) does not directly account for middle ear pressure effects. On the other hand, WBA measured at tympanometric peak pressure (TPP) (WBATPP) may compensate for the middle ear pressure effects. To date, there are no studies that have compared WBAA and WBATPP in ears with surgically confirmed otitis media with effusion (OME). Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive accuracy of WBAA and WBATPP in ears with OME. Research Design Prospective cross-sectional study. Study Sample A total of 60 ears from 38 healthy children (mean age = 6.5 years, SD = 1.84 years) and 60 ears from 38 children (mean age = 5.5 years, SD = 3.3 years) with confirmed OME during myringotomy were included in this study. Data Collection and Analysis Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. The predictive accuracy of WBAA and WBATPP was determined using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses. Results Both WBAA and WBATPP were reduced in ears with OME compared with that in healthy ears. The area under the ROC (AROC) curve was 0.92 for WBAA at 1.5 kHz, whereas that for WBATPP at 1.25 kHz was 0.91. In comparison, the AROC for 226-Hz tympanometry based on the static acoustic admittance (Ytm) measure was 0.93. Conclusions Both WBAA and WBATPP showed high and similar test performance, but neither test performed significantly better than 226-Hz tympanometry for detection of surgically confirmed OME.
DOI :	10.3766/jaaa.19012\|1
Disponible en ligne :	Oui/Non
En ligne :	https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://medone-comsci.thieme.com/ejourn [...]
Permalink :	https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=261779

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA). Vol.31, n°7 (July/August 2020)	Périodique papier	Ixelles	Rez	Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt

Nouvelle recherche

Votre compte

Se connecter

Historique

Connexion Ecam et extérieurs

Si vous disposez d'un compte office 365 @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le bouton connectez-vous !

Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous.

Bibliothèques HE Vinci

Exemplaires (1)

Accueil

Se connecter

Adresse

Connexion Ecam et extérieurs