Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Interaction Between Recovery of Motor and Language Abilities After Stroke (2020) |
Auteurs : | Valeria Ginex ; Giulia Gilardone ; Mauro Viganò ; Alessia Monti ; Elda Judica ; Ilaria Passaro ; Marco Gilardone ; Nicola Vanacore ; Massimo Corbo |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 101, n° 8, 2020) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1367-1376 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.010 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ; Aphasie ; Langage ; Réadaptation |
Résumé : |
Objective
To analyze the nature of the interaction between motor and language recovery in patients with motor impairment and aphasia following left hemispheric stroke and to investigate prognostic factors of best recovery, that is, the significant recovery of both functions simultaneously. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Specialized inpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants Patients (N=435) with left hemispheric stroke in the postacute phase with motor impairment and aphasia. Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure Patients who reached the minimal clinically important difference in the motor-FIM (M-FIM) were classified as motor responders, patients who reached a significant change in Aachen Aphasia Test were classified as language responders, and patients who reached a simultaneous and significant improvement in both functions were classified as motor and language responders. Results Of the sample 45% were motor responders, 58% were language responders, and 35% were motor and language responders. Responder groups showed lower motor impairment and less severe aphasia at admission and greater improvement in both functions at discharge compared with nonresponder groups. Premorbid autonomy, dysphagia, apraxia, and number of rehabilitative sessions were also significantly different between groups. A logistic regression model identified M-FIM, repetition abilities, and number of sessions of speech and language therapy as independent predictors of best response (ie, motor and language responders). Conclusions This study provides evidence about a possible interaction between motor and language recovery after stroke. The improvement in one function was never associated with deterioration in the other. The results actually suggest a synergic effect between the amelioration of the 2 functions, with an overall increased efficiency when the 2 recovery pathways are combined. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999320302756#! |