Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Exploring the psychometric validity and reliability of the Stillbirth Stigma Scale (2020) |
Auteurs : | Danielle Pollock ; Adrian Esterman ; Elissa Pearson ; Megan Cooper ; Tahereh Ziaian ; Jane Warland |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Midwifery Digest (Midirs) (Vol. 30, n° 2, June 2020) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 151-158 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Echelle d'évaluation ; Méthodologie ; Mortinaissance ; Périnatalité ; Profession de sage-femme ; Psychologie ; Psychométrie ; Santé ; Stéréotypes |
Résumé : |
Background : In 2011 and 2016, the Lancet Stillbirth Series released a call for action to identify mechanisms which could lead to a reduction in stillbirth stigma. Despite this repeated call, stillbirth stigma remains a relatively unexplored area. This research is answering that call by providing further psychometric assessment on the recently developed 20-item Stillbirth Stigma Scale.
Methods : Bereaved parents (n=1015) from high-income countries (Australia, United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), New Zealand and Canada) who have endured a stillbirth were surveyed. A confirmatory factor analysis was undertaken, to confirm the factor structure. Reliability analysis and convergent validity were conducted to further determine the reliability and validity of the scale. Ethics : This study was approved on 5 December 2016 by the University of South Australia Human Research Ethics Committee, protocol number 0000036017. Results : Based on the initial findings of the exploratory factor analysis, 20 items contained within four factors (Perceived Devaluation, Discrimination, Self-stigma and Disclosure) were entered into the confirmatory factor analysis. Results supported a four-factor structure of the Stillbirth Stigma Scale and goodness of fit measurements were satisfactory. Internal consistencies of each sub-scale, and the total scale were good (á =.89). Convergent validity was also established with other related measures (Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale). Conclusion: Analysis suggests the Stillbirth Stigma Scale is a theoretical and statistically sound scale, which can be used within health promotion and clinical settings to identify bereaved parents at risk of experiencing higher levels of stillbirth stigma. |
Disponible en ligne : | Non |
Exemplaires (1)
Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|
Midwifery Digest (Midirs). Vol. 30, n° 2 (June 2020) | Périodique papier | Woluwe | Espace revues | Consultation sur place uniquement Exclu du prêt |