Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Impact of Nontraditional Level I Fieldwork on Critical Thinking (2020) |
Auteurs : | Sarah Nielsen ; Marilyn Klug ; LaVonne Fox |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | American journal of occupational therapy (Vol. 74, n° 3, May/June 2020) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1-7 |
Note générale : | doi:10.5014/ajot.2020.036350 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Enseignement professionnel ; Ergothérapie ; Évaluation des acquis scolaires ; Sens critique |
Résumé : |
Importance: Level I fieldwork is an integral part of occupational therapy education, yet limited research exists on how it affects the development of critical thinking skills.
Objective: To compare the influence of a nontraditional Level I fieldwork experience with that of a traditional Level I fieldwork experience on the development of critical thinking. Design: Nonrandomized, pretestposttest design. Setting: Traditional and nontraditional Level I fieldwork. Participants: Seventy-three fourth-semester Master of Occupational Therapy students enrolled in a physical disabilities or psychosocial Level I fieldwork course. Each group completed the Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT) at the beginning and end of each semester. Intervention: Sixteen-week nontraditional fieldwork or two 1-wk traditional fieldworks. Outcomes and Measures: HSRT. Results: All students showed a significant increase in scores on the Analysis subtest of the HSRT (p =.004). Both Analysis (p =.001) and overall HSRT (p =.025) scores improved significantly for 55 students who completed nontraditional fieldwork. Students who completed nontraditional fieldwork and had taken multiple previous science classes (p =.014) and had a higher grade point average (p =.033) had a greater likelihood of improving their HSRT score. Conclusion and Relevance: Although in this pilot study both Level I traditional and nontraditional fieldwork improved critical thinking, further development and examination of pedagogical approaches that facilitate critical thinking are needed. What This Article Adds: Both traditional and nontraditional Level I fieldwork can improve occupational therapy students' critical thinking skills. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=143041169&lang=fr&site=ehost-live&scope=site |