Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Effectiveness of Mulligans mobilization with movement techniques on pain and disability of peripheral joints: a systematic review with meta-analysis between 20082017 (2019) |
Auteurs : | Nikolaos Stathopoulos ; Zacharias Dimitriadis ; George A. Koumantakis |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Physiotherapy (Vol. 105, n° 1, 2019) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1-9 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Articulations ; Manipulations de l'appareil locomoteur ; Revue systématique |
Résumé : |
Background
The Mulligan method of manual therapy advocates the use of mobilization with movement (MWM) techniques to effectively manage peripheral joint positional fault dysfunctions. Objectives To provide an updated evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effectiveness of MWM techniques. Data sources PubMed, EBSCOhost, PEDro, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar between 1st August 200831st August 2017. Study selection Two reviewers applied the population intervention comparison outcome (PICO) question to screen the studies for this review. Only RCTs/CCTs were included. Data extraction Information on study design, subjects, intervention, outcome measures and efficacy results were extracted. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers using the PEDro Scale. Data synthesis Sixteen studies with 576 participants were included in four separate meta-analyses for pain and disability. The I2 index assessed the heterogeneity between studies. Results MWMs have demonstrated statistically significant improvements against sham treatment, passive and control intervention techniques for pain [mean difference (95%CI): −16.12 (−19.77, −12.48) & I2 = 72%] and disability [mean difference (95%CI): −17.51 (−22.84, −12.19) & I2 = 88%] or against another manual therapy treatment [pain mean difference (95%CI): −10.43 (−11.38, −9.48) & I2 = 0%], however not against another manual therapy treatment for disability. The clinical significance of the pooled differences was compared against Minimal Clinically Important Difference values. Limitations No long-term effectiveness data were identified in any of the included studies. Conclusions and implications of key findings The overall post-intervention short-term statistical and clinical significance of MWM techniques has been verified, although the high heterogeneity identified may require further validation of those methods. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940618302918 |