Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Benchmarks of Significant Change After Aphasia Rehabilitation (2019) |
Auteurs : | Natalie Gilmore ; Michaela Dwyer ; Swathi Kiran |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 100, n° 6, 2019) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1131-1139 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ; Aphasie ; Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Orthophonie ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
Résumé : |
To establish benchmarks of significant change for aphasia rehabilitation outcome measures (ie, Western Aphasia Battery-Aphasia Quotient [WAB-AQ], Communicative Effectiveness Index [CETI], Boston Naming Test [BNT]) and assess if those benchmarks significantly differ across subgroups (ie, time post onset, dose frequency, treatment type).
Data Sources A comprehensive literature search of 12 databases, reference lists of previous reviews, and evidence-based practice materials was conducted. Study Selection Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, single-subject design, and case studies that used a standardized outcome measure to assess change were included. Titles and full-text articles were screened using a dual review process. Seventy-eight studies met criteria for inclusion. Data Extraction Data were extracted independently, and 25% of extractions were checked for reliability. All included studies were assigned quality indicator ratings and an evidence level. Data Synthesis Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted separately for each study design group (ie, within-/between-group comparisons). For within-group designs, the summary effect size after aphasia rehabilitation was 5.03 points (95% confidence interval, 3.95-6.10, P<.001 on the wab-aq points p ceti and bnt. for between-group designs summary effect size was to bnt latter of which not significant. subgroup analyses within-group showed no significant differences in as a function dose frequency or treatment type.> Conclusions This study established benchmarks of significant change on 3 standardized outcome measures used in aphasia rehabilitation. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999318311900 |