Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Does adding cognitive-behavioural physiotherapy to exercise improve outcome in patients with chronic neck pain? A randomised controlled trial (2016) |
Auteurs : | Dave P. Thompson ; J.A. Oldham ; S.R. Woby |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Physiotherapy (2016/2, 2016) |
Article en page(s) : | pp. 170-177 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Cervicalgie ; Cognition ; Comportement ; Exercice physique ; Kinésithérapie (spécialité) |
Mots-clés: | Neck pain ; Exercise ; Behavior ; Physical Therapy Specialty |
Résumé : |
Objectives To determine whether adding a physiotherapist-led cognitive-behavioural intervention to an exercise programme improved outcome in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial. Setting Four outpatient physiotherapy departments. Participants Fifty-seven patients with CNP. Follow-up data were provided by 39 participants [57% of the progressive neck exercise programme (PNEP) group and 79% of the interactive behavioural modification therapy (IBMT) group]. Interventions Twenty-eight subjects were randomised to the PNEP group and 29 subjects were randomised to the IBMT group. IBMT is underpinned by cognitive-behavioural principles, and aims to modify cognitive risk factors through interactive educational sessions, graded exercise and progressive goal setting. Main outcome measures The main outcome measure was disability, measured by the Northwick Park Questionnaire (NPQ). Secondary outcomes were the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Pain Catastrophising Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale (CPSS) and the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire. Results No significant between-group differences in disability were observed (mean NPQ change: PNEP = −7.2, IBMT = −10.2). However, larger increases in functional self-efficacy (mean CPSS change: PNEP = 1.0, IBMT = 3.2) and greater reductions in pain intensity (mean NPRS change: PNEP = −1.0, IBMT = −2.2; P Conclusions The primary outcome did not support the use of cognitive-behavioural physiotherapy in all patients with CNP. However, superior outcomes were observed for several secondary measures, and IBMT may offer additional benefit in some patients. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003194061503789X |