Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | The reliability of physical examination tests for the clinical assessment of scapular dyskinesis in subjects with shoulder complaints : A systematic review (2017) |
Auteurs : | Toni Lange ; Jochen Schmitt ; Jorg Lützner ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (Vol. 26, July 2017) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 64-89 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Diagnostic ; Revue de la littérature ; Signes et symptômes ; Test |
Mots-clés: | Dyskinésie scapulaire |
Résumé : |
Study design Systematic review. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and evaluate intra- and interrater reliability research of physical examination tests used for the assessment of scapular dyskinesis. Background Scapular dyskinesis, defined as alteration of normal scapular kinematics, is described as a non-specific response to different shoulder pathologies. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED and PEDro until March 20th, 2015. Methodological quality was assessed with the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) by two independent reviewers. Results The search strategy revealed 3259 articles, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated the reliability of 41 test and test variations used for the assessment of scapular dyskinesis. Conclusion This review identified a lack of high-quality studies evaluating intra- as well as interrater reliability of tests used for the assessment of scapular dyskinesis. In addition, reliability measures differed between included studies hindering proper cross-study comparisons. The effect of manual correction of the scapula on shoulder symptoms was evaluated in only one study, which is striking, since symptom alteration tests are used in routine care to guide further treatment. Thus, there is a strong need for further research in this area. Level of evidence Diagnosis, level 3a. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X16301390 |