Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Sex Differences in Theory-Based Predictors of Leisure Time Physical Activity in a Population-Based Sample of Adults With Spinal Cord Injury (2014) |
Auteurs : | Jessie N. Stapleton ; Kathleen A. Martin Ginis |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2014/9, 2014) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1787-1790 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Exercice physique ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; Soutien social ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinière |
Mots-clés: | Exercise ; Self efficacy ; Auto-efficacité ; Social support ; Spinal cord injuries ; Sports |
Résumé : |
Objective To examine sex differences in theory-based predictors of leisure time physical activity (LTPA) among men and women with spinal cord injury, and secondarily, to identify factors that might explain any sex differences in social cognitions. Design A secondary analysis of Study of Health and Activity in People with Spinal Cord Injury survey data. Setting Community. Participants Community-dwelling men (n=536) and women (n=164) recruited from 4 rehabilitation and research centers. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Subjective norms, attitudes, barrier self-efficacy, perceived controllability (PC), and intentions. Results Men had stronger PC and barrier self-efficacy than women. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that social support significantly predicted PC for both sexes, and health, pain, and physical independence also significantly predicted PC for men. Social support, health, and pain significantly predicted barrier self-efficacy for men. Social support was the only significant predictor of barrier self-efficacy for women. Conclusions Women felt significantly less control over their physical activity behavior and had lower confidence to overcome barriers to physical activity than did men. Although social support predicted PC and barrier self-efficacy in both men and women, men seemed to take additional factors into consideration when formulating their control beliefs for LTPA. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999314002615 |