Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Is Going Beyond Rasch Analysis Necessary to Assess the Construct Validity of a Motor Function Scale? (2018) |
Auteurs : | Tiffanie Guillot ; Sylvain Roche ; Pascal Rippert |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 99, n° 9, 2018) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1776-1782 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Psychométrie |
Mots-clés: | Factor Analysis ; Statistical ; Analyse statistique factorielle ; Neuromuscular diseases ; Maladies neuromusculaires ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Psychometrics |
Résumé : |
Objective To examine whether a Rasch analysis is sufficient to establish the construct validity of the Motor Function Measure (MFM) and discuss whether weighting the MFM item scores would improve the MFM construct validity. Design Observational cross-sectional multicenter study. Setting Twenty-three physical medicine departments, neurology departments, or reference centers for neuromuscular diseases. Participants Patients (N=911) aged 6 to 60 years with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD), or myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Interventions None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Comparison of the goodness-of-fit of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model vs that of a modified multidimensional Rasch model on MFM item scores in each considered disease. Results The CFA model showed good fit to the data and significantly better goodness of fit than the modified multidimensional Rasch model regardless of the disease (P<.001 statistically significant differences in item standardized factor loadings were found between dm1 cmt and fshd only of items> Conclusions For multidimensional scales designed to measure patient abilities in various diseases, a Rasch analysis might not be the most convenient, whereas a CFA is able to establish the scale construct validity and provide weights to adapt the item scores to a specific disease. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999318302053 |