Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Upper Limb Isokinetic Strengthening Versus Passive Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2018) |
Auteurs : | Flavia Coroian ; Claire Jourdan ; Karima Bakhti |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 99, n° 2, 2018) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 321-328 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ; Force musculaire ; Membre supérieur ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
Mots-clés: | Muscle Strength Dynamometer ; Dynamomètre pour la mesure de la force musculaire ; Muscle strength ; Stroke ; Upper extremity |
Résumé : |
Objective To assess the benefit of isokinetic strengthening of the upper limb (UL) in patients with chronic stroke as compared to passive mobilization. Design Randomized blinded assessor controlled trial. Setting Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation departments of 2 university hospitals. Participants Patients (N=20) with incomplete hemiplegia (16 men; mean age, 64y; median time since stroke, 32mo). Interventions A 6-week comprehensive rehabilitation program, 3d/wk, 3 sessions/d. In addition, a 45-minute session per day was performed using an isokinetic dynamometer, with either isokinetic strengthening of elbow and wrist flexors/extensors (isokinetic strengthening group) or passive joint mobilization (control group). Main Outcome Measures The primary endpoint was the increase in Upper Limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UL-FMA) score at day 45 (t1). Secondary endpoints were increases in UL-FMA scores, Box and Block Test scores, muscle strength, spasticity, and Barthel Index at t1, t2 (3mo), and t3 (6mo). Results Recruitment was stopped early because of excessive fatigue in the isokinetic strengthening group. The increase in UL-FMA score at t1 was 3.5+4.4 in the isokinetic strengthening group versus 6.0+4.5 in the control group (P=.2). Gains in distal UL-FMA scores were larger (3.1+2.8) in the control group versus 0.6+2.5 in the isokinetic strengthening group (P=.05). No significant group difference was observed in secondary endpoints. Mixed models confirmed those results. Regarding the whole sample, gains from baseline were significant for the UL-FMA at t1 (+4.8; P<.001 t2 and t3 for the box block test at t1 p=".013)" t2.> Conclusions In a comprehensive rehabilitation program, isokinetic strengthening did not show superiority to passive mobilization for UL rehabilitation. Findings also suggest a sustained benefit in impairments and function of late UL rehabilitation programs for patients with stroke. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999317311164 |