Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Health Behavior Change Counseling in Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Part II: Patient Activation Mediates the Effects of Health Behavior Change Counseling on Rehabilitation Engagement (2015) |
Auteurs : | Richard L. Skolasky ; Anica M. Maggard ; David Li |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2015/7, 2015) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 12081214 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Laminectomie ; Participation des patients ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
Mots-clés: | Laminectomy ; Motivational interviewing ; Entretien motivationnel ; Patient participation ; Spinal stenosis ; Sténose du canal vertébral |
Résumé : |
Objective To determine the effect of health behavior change counseling (HBCC) on patient activation and the influence of patient activation on rehabilitation engagement, and to identify common barriers to engagement among individuals undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Design Prospective clinical trial. Setting Academic medical center. Participants Consecutive lumbar spine surgery patients (N=122) defined in our companion article (Part I) were assigned to a control group (did not receive HBCC, n=59) or HBCC group (received HBCC, n=63). Intervention Brief motivational interviewingbased HBCC versus control (significance, P<.05> Main Outcome Measures We assessed patient activation before and after intervention. Rehabilitation engagement was assessed using the physical therapistreported Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale and by a ratio of self-reported physical therapy and home exercise completion. Common barriers to rehabilitation engagement were identified through thematic analysis. Results Patient activation predicted engagement (standardized regression weight, .682; P<.001 postintervention patient activation was predicted by baseline regression weight .808 p and receipt of hbcc .444 the effect on rehabilitation engagement mediated .079 one-third group did not show improvement compared with control group. thematic analysis identified common barriers to engagement: low self-efficacy because lack knowledge support anxiety related fear movement concern about pain management> Conclusions The influence of HBCC on rehabilitation engagement was mediated by patient activation. Despite improvements in patient activation, one-third of patients reported low rehabilitation engagement. Addressing these barriers should lead to greater improvements in rehabilitation engagement. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999315002580 |