Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Physiotherapy for Sleep Disturbance in People With Chronic Low Back Pain: Results of a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial (2013) |
Auteurs : | Jennifer Eadie ; Alexander Van de Water ; Chris Lonsdale ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2013/11, 2013) |
Article en page(s) : | pp. 2083-2092 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Kinésithérapie (spécialité) ; Lombalgie ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
Mots-clés: | Actigraphy ; Actigraphie ; Dyssomnias ; Dyssomnies ; Low back pain ; Physical Therapy Specialty |
Résumé : |
Objective To determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of physiotherapy for sleep disturbance in chronic low back pain (CLBP) (≥12wks). Design Randomized controlled trial with evaluations at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Setting Outpatient physiotherapy department in an academic teaching hospital. Participants Participants with CLBP were randomly assigned to a walking program (n=20; mean age + SD, 46.4+13.8y), supervised exercise class (n=20; mean age + SD, 41.3+11.9y), or usual physiotherapy (n=20; mean age + SD, 47.1+14.3y). The 3-month evaluation was completed by 44 participants (73%), and 42 (70%) participants completed the 6-month evaluation. Interventions Participants received a physiotherapy-delivered 8-week walking program, an 8-week group supervised exercise class (1 class/wk), or 1-to-1 usual physiotherapy (advice, manual therapy, and exercise). Main Outcome Measures Sleep was assessed by the self-reported Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Diary, and objective actigraphy. Results Groups were comparable at baseline. Most (95%, n=57) of the participants had sleep disturbance. The acceptability of actigraphy was excellent at baseline (58 of 60 participants), but dropped at 3 months (26 of 44 participants). There were improvements on the PSQI and ISI in all groups at 3 and 6 months, with predominantly medium effect sizes (Cohen d=0.20.5). Conclusions The high prevalence of sleep disturbance indicated the feasibility of good recruitment in future trials. The PSQI would be a suitable screening tool and outcome measure alongside an objective nonobtrusive sleep outcome measure. The effectiveness of physiotherapy for sleep disturbance in CLBP warrants investigation in a fully powered randomized controlled trial. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/archives-of-physical-medicine-and-rehabilitation |