Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Satisfaction and Problems Experienced With Transfemoral Suspension Systems: A Comparison Between Common Suction Socket and Seal-In Liner (2013) |
Auteurs : | Hossein Gholizadeh ; Noor Azuan Abu Osman ; Arezoo Eshraghi ; et al. |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2013/8, 2013) |
Article en page(s) : | pp. 1584-1589 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Amputation ; Prothèses et implants ; Rééducation et réadaptation |
Mots-clés: | Patient satisfaction ; Satisfaction du patient ; Prostheses and implants |
Résumé : |
Objective To compare a seal-in liner with the common suction socket with regards to patient satisfaction and problems experienced with the prosthesis. Design Retrospective survey. Setting A medical and engineering research center and a department of biomechanical engineering. Participants Men (N=90) with traumatic transfemoral amputation who used both suspension systems participated in the study. Intervention Two prosthetic suspension systems: a seal-in liner and common suction socket. Main Outcome Measures Two questionnaires were completed by each subject to evaluate their satisfaction and problems experienced with the 2 suspension systems. Satisfaction and problems with the prosthetic suspension systems were analyzed in terms of fitting, donning and doffing, sitting, walking, stair negotiation, appearance, sweating, wounds, pain, irritation, pistoning, edema, smell, sound, and durability. Results The study revealed that the respondents were more satisfied with a seal-in liner with regards to fitting, sitting, and donning and doffing. Overall satisfaction increased with the use of a seal-in liner compared with the suction socket (P<.05 however satisfaction with the prosthesis showed no significant differences in terms of walking and uneven surfaces appearance stair negotiation. furthermore problems experienced differed significantly between suspension systems sweating wounds pain irritation pistoning edema smell sound were less problematic use a seal-in liner whereas durability was better suction socket.> Conclusions The results of the survey suggest that satisfaction and problems with prosthetic suspension in persons with transfemoral amputation can be improved with a seal-in liner compared with the suction socket, provided that the durability of the liner is enhanced. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/archives-of-physical-medicine-and-rehabilitation |