[article] Titre : |
Delphi Study to Determine Rehabilitation Research Priorities for Older Adults With Cancer |
Type de document : |
Article |
Auteurs : |
Kathleen Doyle Lyons ; Mary Vining Radomski ; Catherine M. Alfano |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 904-914 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Consensus ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; Sujet âgé ; Tumeurs
|
Mots-clés : |
Aged Neoplasms Strategic planning Planification stratégique |
Résumé : |
Objective
To solicit expert opinions and develop consensus around the research that is needed to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults.
Design
Delphi methods provided a structured process to elicit and prioritize research questions from national experts.
Setting
National, Web-based survey.
Participants
Members (N=32) of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine completed at least 1 of 3 investigator-developed surveys.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
In the first survey, participants identified up to 5 research questions that needed to be answered to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults. In 2 subsequent surveys, participants viewed the compilation of questions, rated the importance of each question, and identified the 5 most important questions. This generated priority scores for each question. Consensus scores were created to describe the degree of agreement around the priority of each question.
Results
Highest priority research concerns the epidemiology and measurement of function and disability in older adult cancer survivors; the effects of cancer rehabilitation interventions on falls, disability, participation, survival, costs, quality of care, and health care utilization; and testing models of care that facilitate referrals from oncology to rehabilitation providers as part of coordinated, multicomponent care.
Conclusions
A multipronged approach is needed to fill these gaps, including targeted funding opportunities developed with an advisory panel of cancer rehabilitation experts, development of a research network to facilitate novel collaborations and grant proposals, and coordinated efforts of clinical groups to advocate for funding, practice change, and policy change. |
Disponible en ligne : |
Oui |
En ligne : |
https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] |
Permalink : |
https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=117743 |
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > 2017/5 (2017) . - pp. 904-914
[article] Delphi Study to Determine Rehabilitation Research Priorities for Older Adults With Cancer [Article] / Kathleen Doyle Lyons ; Mary Vining Radomski ; Catherine M. Alfano . - pp. 904-914. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > 2017/5 (2017) . - pp. 904-914 Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Consensus ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; Sujet âgé ; Tumeurs
|
Mots-clés : |
Aged Neoplasms Strategic planning Planification stratégique |
Résumé : |
Objective
To solicit expert opinions and develop consensus around the research that is needed to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults.
Design
Delphi methods provided a structured process to elicit and prioritize research questions from national experts.
Setting
National, Web-based survey.
Participants
Members (N=32) of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine completed at least 1 of 3 investigator-developed surveys.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
In the first survey, participants identified up to 5 research questions that needed to be answered to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults. In 2 subsequent surveys, participants viewed the compilation of questions, rated the importance of each question, and identified the 5 most important questions. This generated priority scores for each question. Consensus scores were created to describe the degree of agreement around the priority of each question.
Results
Highest priority research concerns the epidemiology and measurement of function and disability in older adult cancer survivors; the effects of cancer rehabilitation interventions on falls, disability, participation, survival, costs, quality of care, and health care utilization; and testing models of care that facilitate referrals from oncology to rehabilitation providers as part of coordinated, multicomponent care.
Conclusions
A multipronged approach is needed to fill these gaps, including targeted funding opportunities developed with an advisory panel of cancer rehabilitation experts, development of a research network to facilitate novel collaborations and grant proposals, and coordinated efforts of clinical groups to advocate for funding, practice change, and policy change. |
Disponible en ligne : |
Oui |
En ligne : |
https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] |
Permalink : |
https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=117743 |
|