Résultat de la recherche
33 résultat(s) recherche sur le mot-clé 'Patient Outcome Assessment' 




Validity of Single-Item Patient-Rated Outcomes in Adolescent Football Athletes With Concussion / Alison R. Valier in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016/7 (2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Validity of Single-Item Patient-Rated Outcomes in Adolescent Football Athletes With Concussion Type de document : Article Auteurs : Alison R. Valier ; Cailee E. Welch Bacon ; R. Curtis Bay Article en page(s) : pp. 12021205 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Qualité de vie ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; Soins centrés sur le patientMots-clés : Athletic injuries Traumatismes sportifs Patient-centered care Patient outcome assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Quality of life Résumé : Objective
To determine the longitudinal and concurrent validity of single-item patient-rated outcomes (PROs) in adolescent football athletes with concussion.
Design
Longitudinal.
Setting
Athletic training facilities.
Participants
Convenience sample of male adolescent interscholastic athletes (n=94; mean age, 15.7+1.1y; mean grade, 10.1+1.1) from a larger investigation who suffered a sport-related concussion during football and had at least 3 follow-up assessments at 3, 10, and 30 days postinjury (N=249).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Participants were administered 3 global rating questions (1 generic, 1 for daily activities, and 1 for athletic activities) along with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS), and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) at 3, 10, and 30 days postconcussion. Longitudinal validity was determined through a mixed linear model with random effects for subjects, with pairwise differences assessed using Bonferroni correction (P<.05 concurrent validity was determined by examining spearman correlations between the single-item pros and multi-item pros.> Results
All 3 single-item PROs improved over time, demonstrating longitudinal validity (P<.001 except day versus for global change fair to moderate correlations were identified between the single-item pros and pedsql mfs hit-6.> Conclusions
The improvement of single-item PRO scores over a postinjury time period of 30 days suggests that these PROs respond as expected to patient recovery. The correlations identified between the single-item PROs and common multi-item PROs used in athletes with concussion demonstrate concurrent validity. Therefore, single-item PROs appear to measure patient progress in adolescent football athletes postconcussion.DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.015 Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=118019
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > 2016/7 (2016) . - pp. 12021205[article]Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Vestibular Research / Eric Fong in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2015/2 (2015)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Vestibular Research Type de document : Article Auteurs : Eric Fong ; Carol Li ; Rebecca Aslakson Article en page(s) : p. 357-365 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; VertigeMots-clés : Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient Outcome Assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Vertigo Vestibular function tests Épreuves vestibulaires Résumé : Objective
To identify the most commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical vestibular research, and to assess their test characteristics and applicability to the study of age-related vestibular loss in clinical trials.
Data Sources
We performed a systematic review of the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO databases from 1950 to August 13, 2013.
Study Selection
PRO measures were defined as outcomes that capture the subjective experience of the patient (eg, symptoms, functional status, health perceptions, quality of life). Two independent reviewers selected studies that used PRO measures in clinical vestibular research. Disparities were resolved with consensus between the reviewers. Of 2260 articles initially found in the literature search, 255 full-text articles were retrieved for assessment. Of these, 104 met inclusion criteria for data collection.
Data Extraction
PRO measures were identified by 2 independent reviewers. The 4 most commonly used PROs were evaluated for their applicability to the condition of age-related vestibular loss. Specifically, for these 4 PROs, data were collected pertaining to instrument test-retest reliability, item domains, and target population of the instrument.
Data Synthesis
A total of 50 PRO instruments were identified. The 4 most frequently used PROs were the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Vertigo Symptom Scale-short form, and visual analog scale. Of these 4 PROs, 3 were validated for use in patients with vestibular disease and 1 was validated in community-dwelling older individuals with balance impairments. Items across the 4 PROs were categorized into 3 domains based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: activity, participation, and body functions and structures.
Conclusions
None of the most commonly used PRO instruments were validated for use in community-dwelling older adults with age-related vestibular loss. Nevertheless, the 3 common domains of items identified across these 4 PRO instruments may be generalizable to older adults and provide a basis for developing a PRO instrument designed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions targeted toward age-related vestibular loss.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=118552
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > 2015/2 (2015) . - p. 357-365[article]Symptom Burden and Comorbidities Impact the Consistency of Responses on Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes / Andrea L. Cheville in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014/1 (2014)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Symptom Burden and Comorbidities Impact the Consistency of Responses on Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes Type de document : Article Auteurs : Andrea L. Cheville ; Jeffrey Rogers Basford ; Katiuska Dos santos ; [et al.] Article en page(s) : pp. 79-86 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Comorbidité ; TumeursMots-clés : Patient Outcome Assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Comorbidity Résumé : Objective
To assess the influence of symptom intensity, mood, and comorbidities on patient-clinician agreement and the consistency of responses to functional patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Design
Two data sources were used. The first, a cross-sectional database of patients with breast cancer who completed functional PROs and were administered the FIM, was used to examine whether average pain intensity (as measured with an 11-point numeric rating scale [NRS]) and Rand Mental Health inventory scores differed among those rating their functional independence as different than clinicians. The second, a longitudinal database of 311 adults with late-stage lung cancer who completed the Activity Measure for Post Acute Care Computer Adaptive Test (AM PAC CAT) with differences between their expected and actual responses as reflected in their AM PAC CAT SEs.
Setting
Two tertiary medical centers.
Participants
Data source #1, 163 women with stage IV breast cancer; data source #2, 311 adults with late-stage lung cancer.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Data source #1, FIM, pain NRS, Older Americans Resource Study activities of daily living subscale, Physical Function-10, Mental Health Inventory-17. Data source #2, AM PAC CAT and NRS symptom ratings.
Results
Pain intensity was significantly higher when clinicians and patients disagreed regarding a patient's independence in the ability to transfer (NRS pain severity, 3.78 vs 2.40; P=.014), groom (3.71 vs 2.36, P=.009), bathe (3.76 vs 2.40, P=.016), and dress (3.09 vs 2.44, P=.034). The magnitude of AM PAC CAT SEs was significantly associated with the severity of participants' pain, dyspnea, and fatigue, as well as the presence of musculoskeletal disorders and coronary artery disease. Neither mood nor emotional distress was associated with clinician-patient agreement or AM PAC CAT SE.
Conclusions
Pain intensity is associated with disagreement between patients and clinicians about the patient's level of functioning. Moreover, physical symptoms (pain, dyspnea, fatigue) as well as specific medical comorbidities (musculoskeletal disorders, coronary artery disease), but not mood, are associated with inconsistency in patients' assessment of their functional abilities.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=117700
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > 2014/1 (2014) . - pp. 79-86[article]The Importance of Voluntary Behavior in Rehabilitation Treatment and Outcomes / John Whyte in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The Importance of Voluntary Behavior in Rehabilitation Treatment and Outcomes Type de document : Article Auteurs : John Whyte ; Marcel P. Dijkers ; Tessa Hart Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 156-163 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Classification ; Participation des patients ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; ThérapeutiqueMots-clés : Patient outcome assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Patient participation Therapeutics Treatment Outcome Résultat thérapeutique Volition Résumé : Most rehabilitation treatments are volitional in nature, meaning that they require the patients active engagement and effort. Volitional treatments are particularly challenging to define in a standardized fashion, because the clinician is not in complete control of the patients role in enacting these treatments. Current recommendations for describing treatments in research reports fail to distinguish between 2 fundamentally different aspects of treatment design: the selection of treatment ingredients to produce the desired functional change and the selection of ingredients that will ensure the patients volitional performance. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a conceptual scheme for standardizing the way that rehabilitation treatments are defined by all disciplines across all areas of rehabilitation. The RTSS highlights the importance of volitional behavior in many treatment areas and provides specific guidance for how volitional treatments should be specified. In doing so, it suggests important crosscutting research questions about the nature of volitional behavior, factors that make it more or less likely to occur, and ingredients that are most effective in ensuring that patients perform desired treatment activities. Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119138
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019) . - p. 156-163[article]Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Through Improved Specification of Interventions / Jeanne M. Zanca in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Through Improved Specification of Interventions Type de document : Article Auteurs : Jeanne M. Zanca ; Lyn S. Turkstra ; Christine Chen Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 164-171 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Classification ; Participation des patients ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; ThérapeutiqueMots-clés : Patient outcome assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Patient participation Therapeutics Volition Résumé : Rehabilitation clinicians strive to provide cost-effective, patient-centered care that optimizes outcomes. A barrier to this ideal is the lack of a universal system for describing, or specifying, rehabilitation interventions. Current methods of description vary across disciplines and settings, creating barriers to collaboration, and tend to focus mostly on functional deficits and anticipated outcomes, obscuring connections between clinician behaviors and changes in functioning. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is the result of more than a decade of effort by a multidisciplinary group of rehabilitation clinicians and researchers to develop a theory-based framework to specify rehabilitation interventions. The RTSS describes interventions for treatment components, which consist of a target (functional change brought about as a direct result of treatment), ingredients (actions taken by clinicians to change the target), and a hypothesized mechanism of action, as stated in a treatment theory. The RTSS makes explicit the connections between functional change and clinician behavior, and recognizes the role of patient effort in treatment implementation. In so doing, the RTSS supports clinicians efforts to work with their patients to set achievable goals, select appropriate treatments, adjust treatment plans as needed, encourage patient participation in the treatment process, communicate with team members, and translate research findings to clinical care. The RTSS may help both expert and novice clinicians articulate their clinical reasoning processes in ways that benefit treatment planning and clinical education, and may improve the design of clinical documentation systems, leading to more effective justification and reimbursement for services. Interested clinicians are invited to apply the RTSS in their local settings. Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119139
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019) . - p. 164-171[article]A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments / Tessa Hart in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019)
PermalinkIntermediate Care pathways for musculoskeletal conditions Are they working? A systematic review / A. Hussenbux in Physiotherapy, 2015/1 (2015)
PermalinkRehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews / Fary Khan in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/2 (2017)
PermalinkDevelopment and Psychometric Validation of Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL) / Nathan T. Kearns in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 99, n° 9 (2018)
PermalinkValidation of the Participation Measure3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D) / Feng-Hang Chang in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/12 (2017)
PermalinkEntretien avec Brigitte Gagnon, ergothérapeute québéquoise, conceptrice de la Mesure du contrôle postural assis de l'adulte 2.0 (MCPAA 2.0) / Elise Dupitier in Ergothérapies, 66 (2017)
PermalinkPatient-Reported Mobility: A Systematic Review / Arrate Pinto-Carral in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016/7 (2016)
PermalinkDevelopment of the Participation Measure3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D): A New Outcome Measure for Rehabilitation / Feng-Hang Chang in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/2 (2017)
PermalinkDeterminants of Living Well With Aphasia in the First Year Poststroke: A Prospective Cohort Study / Linda E. Worrall in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/2 (2017)
PermalinkInterrater Reliability of the Neuromuscular Recovery Scale for Spinal Cord Injury / Michele D. Basso in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2015/8 (2015)
PermalinkDevelopment and Preliminary Psychometrics of the Exercise Therapy Burden Questionnaire for Patients With Chronic Conditions / William Martin in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/11 (2017)
PermalinkMeasuring Participation of Rehabilitation Patients: Test-Retest Reliability and Mode of Administration Concordance of the Participation Measure3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D) / Feng-Hang Chang in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/8 (2017)
PermalinkSex Differences in Patients With Different Stages of Knee Osteoarthritis / David S. Logerstedt in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014/12 (2014)
PermalinkAbility of physiotherapists to undertake evidence-based practice steps: a scoping review / C. Condon in Physiotherapy, 2016/1 (2016)
PermalinkTestRetest Reliability of the Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA) / Alisha Ohl in American journal of occupational therapy, Vol. 69, n° 2 (March/April 2015)
Permalink1000 Norms Project: protocol of a cross-sectional study cataloging human variation / Marnee J. McKay in Physiotherapy, 2016/1 (2016)
PermalinkAn Item Bank to Measure Systems, Services, and Policies: Environmental Factors Affecting People With Disabilities / Jin-Shei Lai in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016/12 (2016)
PermalinkEffect of Comorbid Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis on Longitudinal Clinical and Health Care Use Outcomes in Older Adults With New Visits for Back Pain / Sean D. Rundell in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/1 (2017)
PermalinkMeasuring Access to Information and Technology: Environmental Factors Affecting Persons With Neurologic Disorders / Elizabeth A. Hahn in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016/8 (2016)
PermalinkMinimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis / Elisa Gervasoni in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/2 (2017)
Permalink