Résultat de la recherche
36 résultat(s) recherche sur le mot-clé 'Évaluation des résultats des patients' 




The development of an outcome measures toolkit for spinal cord injury rehabilitation / Christie W.L. Chan in Revue canadienne d'ergothérapie, 2017/2 (2017)
[article]
Titre : The development of an outcome measures toolkit for spinal cord injury rehabilitation Titre traduit : Création dune trousse de mesures des résultats pour la réadaptation des personnes ayant subi une lésion de la moelle épinière Type de document : Article Auteurs : Christie W.L. Chan ; William C. Miller ; Matthew Querée Article en page(s) : pp. 119-129 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Consensus ; Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; PsychométrieMots-clés : Patient Outcome Assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Delphi Technique Méthode Delphi Psychometrics Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Résumé : Background.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex medical condition that can be difficult to monitor.
Purpose.
This study aimed to establish a common set of validated outcome measures specifically for SCI clinical practice.
Method.
In a three-round online Delphi process, experts in SCI care across Canada suggested and ranked outcome measures for clinical practice. The facilitators provided feedback between rounds and determined if consensus (at least 75% agreement) was reached on a single outcome measure per clinical area.
Findings.
One hundred and forty-eight outcome measures were initially considered for inclusion. After three rounds, consensus was reached for 23 out of 30 clinical areas. In the remaining seven, more than one outcome measure was recommended. The final toolkit comprises 33 outcome measures with sufficient measurement properties for use with a SCI population.
Implications.
An outcome measures toolkit validated specifically for SCI should lead to improved identification of best practice and enable clinicians to monitor client progress effectively.Disponible en ligne : Non Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119906
in Revue canadienne d'ergothérapie > 2017/2 (2017) . - pp. 119-129[article]Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité RevCanErg 2017 P2017/2 Périodique papier Woluwe Revues-W Consultation sur place uniquement
Exclu du prêtSystematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Vestibular Research / Eric Fong in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2015/2 (2015)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Vestibular Research Type de document : Article Auteurs : Eric Fong ; Carol Li ; Rebecca Aslakson Article en page(s) : p. 357-365 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; VertigeMots-clés : Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient Outcome Assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Vertigo Vestibular function tests Épreuves vestibulaires Résumé : Objective
To identify the most commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical vestibular research, and to assess their test characteristics and applicability to the study of age-related vestibular loss in clinical trials.
Data Sources
We performed a systematic review of the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO databases from 1950 to August 13, 2013.
Study Selection
PRO measures were defined as outcomes that capture the subjective experience of the patient (eg, symptoms, functional status, health perceptions, quality of life). Two independent reviewers selected studies that used PRO measures in clinical vestibular research. Disparities were resolved with consensus between the reviewers. Of 2260 articles initially found in the literature search, 255 full-text articles were retrieved for assessment. Of these, 104 met inclusion criteria for data collection.
Data Extraction
PRO measures were identified by 2 independent reviewers. The 4 most commonly used PROs were evaluated for their applicability to the condition of age-related vestibular loss. Specifically, for these 4 PROs, data were collected pertaining to instrument test-retest reliability, item domains, and target population of the instrument.
Data Synthesis
A total of 50 PRO instruments were identified. The 4 most frequently used PROs were the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Vertigo Symptom Scale-short form, and visual analog scale. Of these 4 PROs, 3 were validated for use in patients with vestibular disease and 1 was validated in community-dwelling older individuals with balance impairments. Items across the 4 PROs were categorized into 3 domains based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: activity, participation, and body functions and structures.
Conclusions
None of the most commonly used PRO instruments were validated for use in community-dwelling older adults with age-related vestibular loss. Nevertheless, the 3 common domains of items identified across these 4 PRO instruments may be generalizable to older adults and provide a basis for developing a PRO instrument designed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions targeted toward age-related vestibular loss.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=118552
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > 2015/2 (2015) . - p. 357-365[article]Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Through Improved Specification of Interventions / Jeanne M. Zanca in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Advancing Rehabilitation Practice Through Improved Specification of Interventions Type de document : Article Auteurs : Jeanne M. Zanca ; Lyn S. Turkstra ; Christine Chen Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 164-171 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Classification ; Participation des patients ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; ThérapeutiqueMots-clés : Patient outcome assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Patient participation Therapeutics Volition Résumé : Rehabilitation clinicians strive to provide cost-effective, patient-centered care that optimizes outcomes. A barrier to this ideal is the lack of a universal system for describing, or specifying, rehabilitation interventions. Current methods of description vary across disciplines and settings, creating barriers to collaboration, and tend to focus mostly on functional deficits and anticipated outcomes, obscuring connections between clinician behaviors and changes in functioning. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is the result of more than a decade of effort by a multidisciplinary group of rehabilitation clinicians and researchers to develop a theory-based framework to specify rehabilitation interventions. The RTSS describes interventions for treatment components, which consist of a target (functional change brought about as a direct result of treatment), ingredients (actions taken by clinicians to change the target), and a hypothesized mechanism of action, as stated in a treatment theory. The RTSS makes explicit the connections between functional change and clinician behavior, and recognizes the role of patient effort in treatment implementation. In so doing, the RTSS supports clinicians efforts to work with their patients to set achievable goals, select appropriate treatments, adjust treatment plans as needed, encourage patient participation in the treatment process, communicate with team members, and translate research findings to clinical care. The RTSS may help both expert and novice clinicians articulate their clinical reasoning processes in ways that benefit treatment planning and clinical education, and may improve the design of clinical documentation systems, leading to more effective justification and reimbursement for services. Interested clinicians are invited to apply the RTSS in their local settings. Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119139
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019) . - p. 164-171[article]The Importance of Voluntary Behavior in Rehabilitation Treatment and Outcomes / John Whyte in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The Importance of Voluntary Behavior in Rehabilitation Treatment and Outcomes Type de document : Article Auteurs : John Whyte ; Marcel P. Dijkers ; Tessa Hart Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 156-163 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Classification ; Participation des patients ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; ThérapeutiqueMots-clés : Patient outcome assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Patient participation Therapeutics Treatment Outcome Résultat thérapeutique Volition Résumé : Most rehabilitation treatments are volitional in nature, meaning that they require the patients active engagement and effort. Volitional treatments are particularly challenging to define in a standardized fashion, because the clinician is not in complete control of the patients role in enacting these treatments. Current recommendations for describing treatments in research reports fail to distinguish between 2 fundamentally different aspects of treatment design: the selection of treatment ingredients to produce the desired functional change and the selection of ingredients that will ensure the patients volitional performance. The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) is a conceptual scheme for standardizing the way that rehabilitation treatments are defined by all disciplines across all areas of rehabilitation. The RTSS highlights the importance of volitional behavior in many treatment areas and provides specific guidance for how volitional treatments should be specified. In doing so, it suggests important crosscutting research questions about the nature of volitional behavior, factors that make it more or less likely to occur, and ingredients that are most effective in ensuring that patients perform desired treatment activities. Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119138
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019) . - p. 156-163[article]A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments / Tessa Hart in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments Type de document : Article Auteurs : Tessa Hart ; Marcel P. Dijkers ; John Whyte Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 172-180 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Classification ; Participation des patients ; Rééducation et réadaptation ; ThérapeutiqueMots-clés : Patient outcome assessment Évaluation des résultats des patients Patient participation Therapeutics Volition Résumé : The field of rehabilitation remains captive to the black-box problem: our inability to characterize treatments in a systematic fashion across diagnoses, settings, and disciplines, so as to identify and disseminate the active ingredients of those treatments. In this article, we describe the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS), by which any treatment employed in rehabilitation may be characterized, and ultimately classified according to shared properties, via the 3 elements of treatment theory: targets, ingredients, and (hypothesized) mechanisms of action. We discuss important concepts in the RTSS such as the distinction between treatments and treatment components, which consist of 1 target and its associated ingredients; and the distinction between targets, which are the direct effects of treatment, and aims, which are downstream or distal effects. The RTSS includes 3 groups of mutually exclusive treatment components: Organ Functions, Skills and Habits, and Representations. The last of these comprises not only thoughts and feelings, but also internal representations underlying volitional action; the RTSS addresses the concept of volition (effort) as a critical element for many rehabilitation treatments. We have developed an algorithm for treatment specification which is illustrated and described in brief. The RTSS stands to benefit the field in numerous ways by supplying a coherent, theory-based framework encompassing all rehabilitation treatments. Using a common framework, researchers will be able to test systematically the effects of specific ingredients on specific targets; and their work will be more readily replicated and translated into clinical practice. Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=119140
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019) . - p. 172-180[article]Ability of physiotherapists to undertake evidence-based practice steps: a scoping review / C. Condon in Physiotherapy, 2016/1 (2016)
PermalinkPatient-Reported Mobility: A Systematic Review / Arrate Pinto-Carral in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016/7 (2016)
PermalinkIntermediate Care pathways for musculoskeletal conditions Are they working? A systematic review / A. Hussenbux in Physiotherapy, 2015/1 (2015)
PermalinkRéflexion sur les tests d'évaluation clinique de la proprioception à partir d'une revue de la littérature / Anne-Violette Bruyneel in Kinésithérapie la revue, 143 (2013)
PermalinkDevelopment and Preliminary Psychometrics of the Exercise Therapy Burden Questionnaire for Patients With Chronic Conditions / William Martin in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/11 (2017)
PermalinkMeasuring Participation of Rehabilitation Patients: Test-Retest Reliability and Mode of Administration Concordance of the Participation Measure3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D) / Feng-Hang Chang in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/8 (2017)
PermalinkSex Differences in Patients With Different Stages of Knee Osteoarthritis / David S. Logerstedt in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014/12 (2014)
PermalinkDevelopment and Psychometric Validation of Capacity Assessment of Prosthetic Performance for the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL) / Nathan T. Kearns in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 99, n° 9 (2018)
PermalinkRehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews / Fary Khan in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/2 (2017)
PermalinkUsing Serial Trichotomization With Common Cognitive Tests to Screen for Fitness to Drive. / Carrie Gibbons in American journal of occupational therapy, Vol. 71, n° 2 (March/April 2017)
PermalinkDevelopment of the Participation Measure3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D): A New Outcome Measure for Rehabilitation / Feng-Hang Chang in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/2 (2017)
PermalinkEffect of Comorbid Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis on Longitudinal Clinical and Health Care Use Outcomes in Older Adults With New Visits for Back Pain / Sean D. Rundell in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/1 (2017)
PermalinkEvaluating Individual Change With the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Short Forms / Allan J. Kozlowski in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016/4 (2016)
PermalinkSymptom Burden and Comorbidities Impact the Consistency of Responses on Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes / Andrea L. Cheville in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014/1 (2014)
PermalinkValidation of the Participation Measure3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D) / Feng-Hang Chang in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2017/12 (2017)
PermalinkVariation in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes in the United States / Nathaniel H. Greene in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014/6 (2014)
Permalink1000 Norms Project: protocol of a cross-sectional study cataloging human variation / Marnee J. McKay in Physiotherapy, 2016/1 (2016)
PermalinkAn Item Bank to Measure Systems, Services, and Policies: Environmental Factors Affecting People With Disabilities / Jin-Shei Lai in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016/12 (2016)
PermalinkCanadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in Primary Care: A Profile of Practice. / Catherine A. Donnelly in American journal of occupational therapy, Vol. 71, n° 6 (November/December 2017)
PermalinkChutes, bilan et devenir [19/19] / Rodolphe Daire in Soins gérontologie, 117 (Janvier/février 2016)
Permalink