|
[article] | Titre : |
The effectiveness of biofeedback for improving pain, disability and work ability in adults with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Type de document : |
Article |
| Auteurs : |
Marc Campo ; Joshua R. Zadro ; Evangelos Pappas ; Marco Monticone ; Claudio Secci ; David Scalzitti ; Jill Lucas Findley ; Petra L. Graham |
| Année de publication : |
2021 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 1-16 |
| Note générale : |
doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102317 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci
Cervicalgie ; Electromyographie ; Exercice physique ; Rétroaction biologique (psychologie)
|
| Résumé : |
Background:
Biofeedback is used to optimise muscle activation patterns in people with neck pain.
Objectives:
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of electromyographic and pressure biofeedback on pain, disability and work ability in adults with neck pain.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods:
We searched key databases and trial registries to September 2020, using terms synonymous with ‘neck pain’ and ‘biofeedback’. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating biofeedback (against any comparison) for adults with neck pain. Outcomes included pain, disability, work ability and adverse events. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. GRADE was applied to each meta-analysis. Data were pooled using random-effects models to determine the standardised mean change (SMC).
Results:
We included 15 RCTs (n = 990). Moderate-quality evidence suggests biofeedback has a moderate effect on reducing short-term disability (SMC = −0.42, 95%CI: 0.59 to −0.26, nine trials, n = 627), and a small effect on reducing intermediate-term disability (SMC = −0.30, 95%CI: 0.53 to −0.06, five trials, n = 458). Biofeedback had no effect on pain or work ability in the short- and intermediate-term (low-to moderate-quality evidence). One study reported headaches in 6.7% of participants, but headache frequency was not reported by group.
Limitations:
There were a variety of control interventions across studies. Few studies compared biofeedback with no treatment or placebo.
Conclusion:
Biofeedback appears to have a small-to-moderate effect on reducing neck pain disability in the short- and intermediate-term, but no effect on pain or work ability. More trials reporting adverse events and comparing biofeedback to placebo are needed. |
| Disponible en ligne : |
Oui |
| En ligne : |
https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] |
| Permalink : |
https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=268682 |
in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice > Vol. 52 (April 2021) . - p. 1-16
[article] The effectiveness of biofeedback for improving pain, disability and work ability in adults with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Article] / Marc Campo ; Joshua R. Zadro ; Evangelos Pappas ; Marco Monticone ; Claudio Secci ; David Scalzitti ; Jill Lucas Findley ; Petra L. Graham . - 2021 . - p. 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102317 Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice > Vol. 52 (April 2021) . - p. 1-16 | Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci
Cervicalgie ; Electromyographie ; Exercice physique ; Rétroaction biologique (psychologie)
|
| Résumé : |
Background:
Biofeedback is used to optimise muscle activation patterns in people with neck pain.
Objectives:
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of electromyographic and pressure biofeedback on pain, disability and work ability in adults with neck pain.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods:
We searched key databases and trial registries to September 2020, using terms synonymous with ‘neck pain’ and ‘biofeedback’. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating biofeedback (against any comparison) for adults with neck pain. Outcomes included pain, disability, work ability and adverse events. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. GRADE was applied to each meta-analysis. Data were pooled using random-effects models to determine the standardised mean change (SMC).
Results:
We included 15 RCTs (n = 990). Moderate-quality evidence suggests biofeedback has a moderate effect on reducing short-term disability (SMC = −0.42, 95%CI: 0.59 to −0.26, nine trials, n = 627), and a small effect on reducing intermediate-term disability (SMC = −0.30, 95%CI: 0.53 to −0.06, five trials, n = 458). Biofeedback had no effect on pain or work ability in the short- and intermediate-term (low-to moderate-quality evidence). One study reported headaches in 6.7% of participants, but headache frequency was not reported by group.
Limitations:
There were a variety of control interventions across studies. Few studies compared biofeedback with no treatment or placebo.
Conclusion:
Biofeedback appears to have a small-to-moderate effect on reducing neck pain disability in the short- and intermediate-term, but no effect on pain or work ability. More trials reporting adverse events and comparing biofeedback to placebo are needed. |
| Disponible en ligne : |
Oui |
| En ligne : |
https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] |
| Permalink : |
https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=268682 |
|  |
trié(s) par (Pertinence décroissant(e), Titre croissant(e))
Visionner les documents numériques
Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheL’aube de la vie corporopsychique in Neuropsychiatrie de l'enfance et de l'adolescence, Vol. 58, n°6-7 (Septembre 2010)
Biofeedback, principes et applications (1994)
Les effets de 4 semaines de cohérence cardiaque sur la fréquence respiratoire et la fréquence cardiaque des étudiants du cycle supérieur, en comparaison à des séances d’étirements musculaires (2019)
