Descripteurs (mots-clés)


Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music / Donguk Lee in Ear and hearing, Vol. 43, n°3 (Mai-juin 2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music Type de document : Article Auteurs : Donguk Lee ; James D. Lewis ; Patty M. Johnstone ; Patrick N. Plyler Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 1013-1022 Note générale : Doi 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001157 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) ; Compréhension dans le bruit ; Musique ; Rapport signal-bruit (SNRs) (RSB)Résumé : Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of music versus speech on a listener's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) preferences when listening in a noise background. SNR preferences were quantified using acceptable noise level (ANL) and preferred SNR metrics. The measurement paradigm for ANL allows the listener to adjust the level of background noise while listening to the target at their most comfortable loudness level. A higher ANL indicates less tolerance for noise and a lower ANL indicates high tolerance for noise. The preferred SNR is simply the SNR the listener prefers when attending to a target in a fixed-amount (level) of background noise. In contrast to the ANL, the listener does not have control over the noise. Rather, they are only able to manipulate the target level. The first aim of the study was to determine if listeners' tolerances for noise, quantified using the ANL, when listening to music is different from that when listening to speech. The second aim of the study was to determine if listeners' tolerances for noise, quantified using their preferred SNR, when listening to music is different from that when listening to speech. The third aim of the study was to quantify the relationship between ANL and preferred SNR.
Design: Ninety-nine normal-hearing, native-English speakers participated in this study. The ANL and preferred SNR were measured for speech and music targets. Music targets included two variations (with lyrics and without lyrics) of the song "Rocky Top." Measurements were made in the sound field at 0[degrees] azimuth, 1.5 m from a loud speaker. For both ANL and preferred SNR, targets were presented in 12-talker babble noise. The level of the noise was adjusted by the listener during ANL measurement but was fixed in level during the preferred SNR measurement (75 dB A). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to identify any significant effect of target on the ANL and preferred SNR. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between ANL and preferred SNR.
Results: Findings demonstrate a significant effect of target on ANL and preferred SNR. ANLs were highest for speech (mean = 7.2 dB), followed by music with lyrics (6.1 dB), and music without lyrics (2.5 dB). Preferred SNRs were highest for music with lyrics (mean = 2.3 dB), followed by speech (1.2 dB), and music without lyrics (-0.1 dB). A listener's ANL for a given target was strongly correlated with their ANL for a different target (the same was true for preferred SNR); however, ANL for a given target was not a statistically significant predictor of preferred SNR for the same target.
Conclusions: When listening in a background of noise, the listener's tolerance for noise depends on the target to which they are attending, whether music or speech. This dependence is especially evident for ANL measures, and less so for preferred SNR measures. Despite differences in ANL and preferred SNR across targets, a listener's ANL and preferred SNR for one target predicts their ANL and preferred SNR, respectively, for a different target. The lack of correlation between ANL and preferred SNR suggests different mechanisms underly these listener-preference metrics.DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001157|1 Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=J [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=295809
in Ear and hearing > Vol. 43, n°3 (Mai-juin 2022) . - p. 1013-1022[article]Adaptation du test STARR pour la population italienne adulte: un test de parole pour une estimation réaliste dans des conditions d'écoute réelles / Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro ; Deborah Ballantyne ; Elio De Seta in International Journal of Audiology IJA, Vol. 55, n°1-12 (January-December 2016)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Adaptation du test STARR pour la population italienne adulte: un test de parole pour une estimation réaliste dans des conditions d'écoute réelles Type de document : Article Auteurs : Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro ; Deborah Ballantyne ; Elio De Seta Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 262-627 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Audiométrie ; Compréhension dans le bruit ; Implants cochléaires ; Prothèse auditive ; Seuil de réception de la parole (SRT)Résumé : Objectifs : Introduire l'adaptation italienne du test STARR basé sur une méthode adaptative au niveau itinérant pour imiter des conditions d'écoute réelles difficiles à utiliser chez les personnes portant des prothèses auditives. Conception : Des données normatives ont été recueillies et la variabilité inter-listes, ainsi que les effets d'apprentissage, ont été étudiés à l'aide d'une conception intra-sujet avec des mesures répétées. Échantillon de l'étude : un groupe de 32 adultes à audition normale (NH) a participé à l'étude. Résultats: Le seuil moyen de réception de la parole (SRT) pour les sujets NH était de -8,4 dB SNR. La variabilité des SRT moyens entre les listes de tests était relativement faible (≤ 1 dB pour toutes les listes de tests). Les différences statistiquement significatives entre les listes ont été éliminées après application des facteurs de correction. Sur la base de la variabilité des SRT corrigées chez chaque sujet, une différence de 2,8 dB dans les SRT était significative pour les comparaisons de résultats en utilisant une liste de tests par condition et 2 dB en utilisant deux listes par condition. L'analyse statistique n'a montré aucun effet d'apprentissage significatif. Conclusions : Les résultats des auditeurs NH ont suggéré que le test italien STARR pourrait être un complément prometteur aux outils d'évaluation de la parole existants. D'autres études dans des populations ayant une déficience auditive pourraient contribuer à des études multilingues. Accès : Contactez la bibliothèque d'Ixelles si le lien vers la ressource électronique ne fonctionne plus Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://doi-org.ezproxy.vinci.be/10.3109/14992027.2015.1124296 Format de la ressource électronique : Site Internet Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=253613
in International Journal of Audiology IJA > Vol. 55, n°1-12 (January-December 2016) . - p. 262-627[article]Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité International journal of audiology IJA. Vol. 55, n°1-12 (January-December 2016) Périodique papier Ixelles Rez Consultation sur place uniquement
Exclu du prêtAdult normative data for the speech in babble (SiB) test / Chrysa Spyridakou ; Stuart Rosen ; Giorgos Dritsakis ; Doris-Eva Bamiou in International Journal of Audiology IJA, Vol. 59, n°1 (Janvier 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Adult normative data for the speech in babble (SiB) test Type de document : Article Auteurs : Chrysa Spyridakou ; Stuart Rosen ; Giorgos Dritsakis ; Doris-Eva Bamiou Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 33-38 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Compréhension dans le bruit ; Speech in Babble (SIB)Résumé : The Speech in Babble (SiB) test assesses the perception of speech in noise in UK adults. Here, we define the normal range of SiB scores to enable the use of the test in clinic. Accès : Contactez la bibliothèque d'Ixelles si le lien vers la ressource électronique ne fonctionne plus Disponible en ligne : Non En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10. [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=249861
in International Journal of Audiology IJA > Vol. 59, n°1 (Janvier 2020) . - p. 33-38[article]Application of Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients / Yvonne Stelzig ; Dan Hilgert-Becker ; Thomas Wesarg in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol.31, n° 4 (April 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Application of Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Type de document : Article Auteurs : Yvonne Stelzig ; Dan Hilgert-Becker ; Thomas Wesarg Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 246-256 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Compréhension dans le bruit ; Implants cochléaires ; Perte auditive unilatérale (USNHL)Résumé : Previous research showed benefits of remote wireless technology in bilaterally moderate- to-severe hearing-impaired participants provided with hearing aid(s), cochlear implant(s) (CIs), or bimodal devices as well as in single-sided deaf (SSD) cochlear implant recipients (with CI from Cochlear) and normal-hearing (NH) participants.
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of the digital remote wireless microphone system, Roger, on speech recognition at different levels of multisource noise in SSD CI recipients using MED-EL CI sound processor OPUS 2. Outcomes were assessed as a function of the listening condition, Roger receiver type (Roger Focus for NH; Roger Xand Roger MyLink for CI) and accessory mixing ratio.
Study Sample
Eleven adult, SSD participants aided with CI from MED-EL.
Data Collection and Analysis
Speech recognition in noise was assessed in two no-Roger conditions, one Roger X condition, and two Roger MyLink conditions. For the Roger X and no-Roger conditions, speech recognition was tested at 60.3 dB(A) with the Oldenburg Sentence Test in classroom noise at levels of 55, 65, and 75 dB(A). For the two Roger MyLink conditions, speech recognition at 60.3 dB(A) was measured at a noise level of 75 dB(A). Roger X was assessed with an accessory mixing ratio of 1:1 (summation of unattenuated microphone and audio accessory input). For Roger MyLink, two accessory mixing ratios were investigated, MT (1:1, summation of unattenuated microphone and telecoil input) and T with maximum attenuation of microphone input.
Results
Speech recognition at higher noise levels (65 and 75 dB(A)) improved significantly with Roger in both unilateral use conditions (NH + CIRog and NHRog + CI) as well as bilateral use condition (NHRog + CIRog). Both the bilateral application of Roger and the unilateral Roger application on the NH ear outperformed the Roger application on CI alone. There was no statistically significant effect of type of CI Roger receiver (Roger X or Roger MyLink) and the accessory mixing ratio (MT or T) on speech recognition.
Conclusions
Speech recognition for distant speakers in multisource noise improved significantly with the application of Roger in SSD CI recipients. Both the unilateral Roger application on the NH ear or the CI as well as the bilateral Roger application can be recommended.Disponible en ligne : Oui/Non En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://medone-comsci.thieme.com/ejourn [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=258645
in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) > Vol.31, n° 4 (April 2020) . - p. 246-256[article]Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA). Vol.31, n°4 (April 2020) Périodique papier Ixelles Rez Consultation sur place uniquement
Exclu du prêtAssistive Technology for Adults with Hearing Aids / Samuel R. Atcherson in Seminars in hearing, Vol.43, n°2 (May 2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Assistive Technology for Adults with Hearing Aids Type de document : Article Auteurs : Samuel R. Atcherson, Auteur ; Samuel R. Atcherson, Auteur Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 79-84 Note générale : DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748873 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Compréhension dans le bruit ; Normes de référence ; Perte d'audition ; Qualité de vie
Autres descripteurs
Technologie d'assistance auditiveRésumé : Although there is a strong trend of satisfaction with hearing aids, recent consumer surveys indicate that there are still challenges with understanding speech in background noise and low penetration of wireless technologies using many modern-day communication and audio devices, such as smartphones, tablets, and computers. For some listening and communication settings, many patients could benefit from assistive technology that exceeds the capabilities of their hearing aids. When patients are not wearing their hearing aids, such as during sleep, concerns about environmental awareness and safety begin to arise. This article describes some current assistive technologies and accessories that facilitate accessibility to other devices and to satisfy the patient's listening and communication needs. Disponible en ligne : Non En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://medone-comsci.thieme.com/ejourn [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=306033
in Seminars in hearing > Vol.43, n°2 (May 2022) . - p. 79-84[article]Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Seminars in hearing. Vol.43, n°2 (May 2022) Périodique papier Ixelles Rez Consultation sur place uniquement
Exclu du prêtAssociations Between Hearing Health and Well-Being in Unilateral Hearing Impairment / Robert H. Pierzycki in Ear and hearing, Vol. 42, n°3 (Mai- Juin 2021)
PermalinkAssociations between pre-stimulus alpha power, hearing level and performance in a digits-in-noise task / Kevin J. Munro ; Piers Dawes ; Emanuele Perugia in International Journal of Audiology IJA, Vol. 61, n°3 (Mars 2022)
PermalinkAudioChip: A Deep Phenotyping Approach for Deconstructing and Quantifying Audiological Phenotypes of Self-Reported Speech Perception Difficulties / Ishan S. Bhatt in Ear and hearing, Vol. 43, n°3 (Mai-juin 2022)
PermalinkL'audiométrie vocale en présence de bruit et le test AVfB / Léon Dodele in Cahiers de l'audition, Vol. 13, n°6 (Novembre/décembre 2000)
PermalinkAudiovisual Perception of Speech in Noise and Masked Written Text / Adriana A. Zekveld in Ear and hearing, Vol.29, n° 1 (Janvier 2008)
PermalinkAuditory function and prevalence of specific ear and hearing related pathologies in the general population at age 70 / Maria Hoff ; Tomas Tengstrand ; Andre Sadeghi in International Journal of Audiology IJA, Vol. 59, n°9 (Septembre 2020)
PermalinkBackground Speech Disrupts Working Memory Span in 5-Year-Old Children. / Tina Grieco-Calub in Ear and hearing, Vol. 40, n°3 (mai-juin 2019)
PermalinkBilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors / Erika Skoe in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol.30, n° 2 (February 2019)
PermalinkClassroom acoustics and personal FM technology in management of auditory processing disorder / Gail Gegg Rosenberg in Seminars in hearing, Vol. 23, n°4 (November 2002)
PermalinkClinical validation of the Russian Matrix test effect of hearing loss, age, and noise level / Anna Warzybok ; Ekaterina Zhilinskaya ; Marina Goykhburg in International Journal of Audiology IJA, Vol. 59, n°12 (Décembre 2020)
Permalink