Descripteurs (mots-clés)
HE Vinci > Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM)
Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) |


Etendre la recherche sur niveau(x) vers le bas
Laide à lautogestion comme soin standard dans le contexte oncologique / Elke Rammant in Onco Hemato, Vol. 14, n° 6 (Novembre - Décembre 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Laide à lautogestion comme soin standard dans le contexte oncologique : un appel à laction Type de document : Article Auteurs : Elke Rammant Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 102-106 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Autogestion ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Oncologie médicaleRésumé : Compte tenu du nombre croissant danciens patients cancéreux et deffets secondaires causés par leur maladie et leur traitement, on sintéresse de plus en plus à un modèle de soins dans lequel lautogestion occupe une place centrale. Toutefois, la mise en uvre dune aide à lautogestion dans la pratique quotidienne reste un défi majeur et demeure actuellement limitée, tant en Belgique quau niveau international. Cet article a pour objectif dévaluer 6 points daction prioritaires qui ont été établis par le groupe de travail international Global Project on Self-Management;
- point daction 1: préparer les (anciens) patients/aidants proches à participer activement aux soins en modifiant l«ensemble du système»;
- point daction 2: intégrer laide à lautogestion dans la pratique quotidienne et les trajets de soins;
- point daction 3: former les prestataires de soins pour quils puissent proposer une aide à lautogestion;
- point daction 4: justifier les performances au moyen de mesures des résultats rapportés par le patient;
- point daction 5: mener davantage de recherches sur lefficacité de (laide à) lautogestion dans les populations cancéreuses;
- point daction 6: élargir la portée et laccès à laide à lautogestion dans les secteurs des soins de santé, en fonction de la diversité des besoins.
Il est temps de procéder à une révolution pour mieux intégrer laide à lautogestion dans des soins oncologiques individualisés de haute qualité, afin doptimiser les résultats de santé, daccélérer la convalescence et éventuellement daméliorer la survie.Disponible en ligne : Non En ligne : https://interactivepdf.uniflip.com/2//61981/1115510/pub/document.pdf Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=264239
in Onco Hemato > Vol. 14, n° 6 (Novembre - Décembre 2020) . - p. 102-106[article]Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Onco Hemato. Vol. 14, n° 6 (Novembre - Décembre 2020) Périodique papier Woluwe périodiques Consultation sur place uniquement
Exclu du prêtAn evaluation of the measurement properties of the Olerud Molander Ankle Score in adults with an ankle fracture / Rebecca McKeown in Physiotherapy, Vol. 112 (2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : An evaluation of the measurement properties of the Olerud Molander Ankle Score in adults with an ankle fracture Type de document : Article Auteurs : Rebecca McKeown ; Helen Parsons ; David R. Ellard ; Rebecca S. Kearney Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p. 1-8 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2021.03.015 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Fractures de la cheville ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Qualité de vie ; RéadaptationRésumé : Objectives
The aim of this study is to evaluate the measurement properties of the Olerud Molander Ankle Score in adults with an ankle fracture.
Methods
Patients completed outcome measure questionnaires at baseline, six, 10- and 16-weeks postinjury as part of an ongoing clinical trial on ankle fracture rehabilitation. The internal consistency, convergent validity, structural validity and interpretability of the Olerud Molander Ankle Score was assessed. This was achieved through using the respective analysis methods of Cronbach's alpha, correlation coefficients, principal component analysis, evaluation of floor and ceiling scores and estimation of the minimally important change using anchor-based methods.
Results
The Olerud Molander Ankle Score showed adequate convergent validity against hypotheses set in relation to scores of comparator instruments. Principal component analysis demonstrated that the measure has two subscales: ankle function and ankle symptoms. The internal consistency of the measure and the ankle function subscale was sufficient, but inconclusive for the ankle symptoms subscale. There were no floor and ceiling effects present within the scores and the estimated minimally important change was 9.7 points.
Conclusion
The Olerud Molander Ankle Score demonstrates sufficient measurement properties and is likely to be primarily measuring the construct of patient reported function following ankle fracture. Further research should evaluate the relevance of other domains to individuals recovering from and ankle fracture, such as social participation and psychological wellbeing. The development of a core outcome set would be advantageous to standardise outcome measurement collection in this area.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=275050
in Physiotherapy > Vol. 112 (2021) . - p. 1-8[article]An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy / D.G. Kyte in Physiotherapy, 2015/2 (2015)
![]()
[article]
Titre : An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy Type de document : Article Auteurs : D.G. Kyte ; M. Calvert ; Philip J. van der Wees Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : pp. 119-125 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Guide de bonnes pratiques ; Kinésithérapie (spécialité) ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM)Mots-clés : Physical Therapy Specialty Patient Reported Outcome Measures Practice Guideline Résumé : The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is set to rise in physiotherapy. PROMs provide additional patient-centred data which is unique in capturing the patient's own opinion on the impact of their disease or disorder, and its treatment, on their life. Thus, PROMs are increasingly used by clinicians to guide routine patient care, or for the purposes of audit, and are already firmly embedded in clinical research. This article seeks to summarise the key aspects of PROM use for physiotherapists, both in routine clinical practice and in the research setting, and highlights recent developments in the field. Generic and condition-specific PROMs are defined and examples of commonly used measures are provided. The selection of appropriate PROMs, and their effective use in the clinical and research settings is discussed. Finally, existing barriers to PROM use in practice are identified and recent physiotherapy PROM initiatives, led by the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy are explored. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2014.11.003 Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=134216
in Physiotherapy > 2015/2 (2015) . - pp. 119-125[article]Applying a Bookmarking Approach to Setting Clinically Relevant Interpretive Standards for the Spinal Cord InjuryFunctional Index/Capacity Basic Mobility and Self-Care Item Bank Scores / Pamela A. Kisala in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 103, n° 2 (2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Applying a Bookmarking Approach to Setting Clinically Relevant Interpretive Standards for the Spinal Cord InjuryFunctional Index/Capacity Basic Mobility and Self-Care Item Bank Scores Type de document : Article Auteurs : Pamela A. Kisala ; David Victorson ; Ratna Nandakumar ; Andrew Shermeyer ; Denise Fyffe ; Allen W. Heinemann ; Trevor A. Dyson-Hudson ; David S. Tulsky Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 224-236 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.026 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Activités de la vie quotidienne ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Mobilité réduite ; Réadaptation ; Traumatismes de la moelle épinièreRésumé : Objectives
To develop clinically relevant interpretive standards for the Spinal Cord InjuryFunctional Index/Capacity (SCI-FI/C) Basic Mobility and Self-Care item bank scores.
Design
Modified bookmarking standard-setting methodology, including 2 stakeholder consensus meetings with individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and SCI clinicians, respectively, and a final, combined (consumers and clinicians) convergence meeting.
Setting
Two SCI Model System centers in the United States.
Participants
Fourteen adults who work with individuals with traumatic SCI and 14 clinicians who work with individuals with SCI.
Main Outcome Measures
Placement of bookmarks between vignettes based on SCI-FI Basic Mobility and Self-Care T scores. Bookmarks were placed between vignettes representing No Problems, Mild Problems, Moderate Problems, and Severe Problems for each item bank.
Results
Each consensus group resulted in a single set of scoring cut points for the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care item banks. The cut points were similar but not identical between the consumer and clinician groups, necessitating a final convergence meeting. For SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility, the convergence group agreed on cut scores of 61.25 (no problems/mild problems), 51.25 (mild problems/moderate problems), and 41.25 (moderate problems/severe problems). For SCI-FI/C Self-Care, the convergence group agreed on cut scores of 56.25 (no/mild), 51.25 (mild/moderate), and 38.75 (moderate/severe).
Conclusions
The results of this study provide straightforward interpretive guidelines for SCI researchers and clinicians using the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care instruments. These results are appropriate for the full bank, computer adaptive test, and short-form versions of the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care item banks.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=290379
in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Vol. 103, n° 2 (2022) . - p. 224-236[article]Assessing clinical reasoning in physical therapy: discriminative validity of the Reasoning 4 Change instrument / Maria Elven ; Katja Boersma ; Thomas Overmeer in Physiotherapy, Vol. 117 (Décembre 2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Assessing clinical reasoning in physical therapy: discriminative validity of the Reasoning 4 Change instrument Type de document : Article Auteurs : Maria Elven ; Katja Boersma ; Thomas Overmeer Année de publication : 2022 Article en page(s) : p. 8-15 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2022.08.004 Langues : Français (fre) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Education ; Kinésithérapie (spécialité) ; Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients (PROM) ; Prise de décision clinique ; Raisonnement clinique ; Reproductibilité des résultatsRésumé : Objectives To evaluate discriminative validity of the Reasoning 4 Change (R4C) instrument by investigating differences in clinical reasoning skills between first semester, final semester physical therapy students and physical therapy experts. Design Cross-sectional design Setting University and physical therapy practice Participants Students from the first (n?=?87) and final semester (n?=?47) of an entry-level physical therapy program and experts in physical therapy with a behavioral medicine approach (n?=?14). Methods The students and experts answered the web-based R4C instrument on one occasion. The R4C instrument includes four domains designed to assess physical therapists? clinical reasoning skills with a focus on supporting clients? behavior change and has demonstrated acceptable content validity, convergent validity and reliability. Data was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell post hoc test. Results Differences in all domains and subscale scores were found between the three groups. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated that experts scored higher (better clinical reasoning skills) than first semester students in all domains and subscales; and higher scores than final semester students, except for two subscales. Final semester students scored higher than first semester students, except for one subscale. Conclusions The findings highlight differences in clinical reasoning skills focusing on clients? behavior change among physical therapy students with different degrees of training and education in clinical reasoning and physical therapists with extensive experience and expertise. The results provide evidence for the discriminative validity of the R4C instrument which support the use of the R4C instrument in education, research and clinical practice. Contribution of the Paper ?The study results provide evidence for the discriminative validity of the R4C instrument, thus strengthening its validity evidence.?The findings highlight the differences in clinical reasoning skills focusing on clients? behavior change amongst first semester students, final semester students and physical therapy experts.?The R4C instrument may be used as part of regular quality assurance of physical therapy curricula and investigations of students? and practitioners? client-centered approach and behavioral considerations in clinical reasoning. For example, repeated measures over time may reveal changes in students? learning and comparisons between groups may identify strengths and weaknesses in students? and practitioners? clinical reasoning, which may guide curricula modifications and interventions in practice. Note de contenu : Under a Creative Commons license Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=300847
in Physiotherapy > Vol. 117 (Décembre 2022) . - p. 8-15[article]Association of Function, Symptoms, and Social Support Reported in Standardized Outpatient Clinic Questionnaires With Subsequent Hospital Discharge Disposition and 30-Day Readmissions / Tamra Keeney in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 103, n° 12 (2022)
PermalinkBarrières et bénéfices à l'utilisation de mesures de résultats rapportés par le patient ("PRO" ou "PROM's") dans des soins cliniques de routine / Lindsey M. Philpot in Info nursing, 194 (Octobre - décembre 2019)
PermalinkBuilding a Rehabilitative Care Measurement Instrument to Improve the Patient Experience / Josephine McMurray in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 1 (2019)
PermalinkCapturing PROMs in Oncology Through Consistent Nutrition Risk Identification: An Opportunity to Optimize Care by Embedding Patient Participation Facilitated by eHealth Tools / Susana Couto Irving in Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics, Vol. 1, n° 3, 2021 (October 2021)
PermalinkCardiac Rehabilitation for Patients Treated for Atrial Fibrillation With Ablation Has Long-Term Effects: 12-and 24-Month Follow-up Results From the Randomized CopenHeartRFA Trial / Signe Stelling Risom in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 101, n° 11 (2020)
PermalinkCarrefours de la douleur 2018. Paris, les 26 et 27 janvier 2018 / F. Clere in Douleurs, Vol. 19, n° 1HS (Juillet 2018)
PermalinkCharacterizing the Experience of Spasticity after Spinal Cord Injury: A National Survey Project of the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers / Edelle C. Field-Fote in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 103, n° 4 (2022)
PermalinkClinical Potential of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Occupational Therapy. / Brocha Z. Stern in American journal of occupational therapy, Vol. 76, n° 2 (March 2022)
PermalinkCognition in Patients With Burn Injury in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Population / Maulik Purohit in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014/7 (2014)
PermalinkComprehensive ADL Outcome Measurement after Stroke: Rasch Validation of the Lucerne ICF-Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (LIMOS) / Ann Van de Winckel in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 100, n° 12 (2019)
Permalink