Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Andrew Vermiglio |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur



An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology / Andrew Vermiglio in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol. 29, n°3 (March 2018)
![]()
[article]
Titre : An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology Type de document : Article Auteurs : Andrew Vermiglio ; Sigfrid D. Soli ; Xiangming Fang Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 206-222 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Audiogramme ; Audition ; Auto-évaluation diagnostique ; Reconnaissance de la parole ; Sensibilité ; Trouble du traitement auditif (APD)Résumé : Background:
The primary components of a diagnostic accuracy study are an index test, the target condition (or disorder), and a reference standard. According to the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy statement, the reference standard should be the best method available to independently determine if the results of an index test are correct. Pure-tone thresholds have been used as the gold standard for the validation of some tests used in audiology. Many studies, however, have shown a lack of agreement between the audiogram and the patients perception of hearing ability. For example, patients with normal audiograms may report difficulty understanding speech in the presence of background noise.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://medone-comsci.thieme.com/ejourn [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=220552
in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) > Vol. 29, n°3 (March 2018) . - p. 206-222[article]An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness / Andrew Vermiglio ; Stephanie Griffin ; Courtney Post ; Xiangming Fang in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol.29, n°7 (July/August 2018)
![]()
[article]
Titre : An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness Type de document : Article Auteurs : Andrew Vermiglio ; Stephanie Griffin ; Courtney Post ; Xiangming Fang Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 634-647 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Audition binaurale ; Seuil auditif ; Son pur ; Surdité unilatérale
Autres descripteurs
Hearing in Noise Test (HINT)Résumé : According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a pure-tone threshold average (PTA) ≤25 dB HL for the better ear represents no impairment. This implies that patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) would have no or very slight hearing problems. According to the American Medical Association (AMA), a patient with SSD would receive a binaural hearing impairment rating of 16.7%. The premise of the WHO and AMA methods is that PTA is related to the ability to perceive speech in everyday environments.
The overall goal of the study was to evaluate the WHO and AMA criteria for the rating of hearing impairment. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of simulated SSD on the ability to recognize speech in the presence of background noise in terms of binaural and spatial advantage measures.
Study participants were tested using the standard protocol for the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) in both binaural and monaural conditions using a simulated soundfield environment under headphones. The target sentences were presented at 0°. Binaural thresholds were obtained for the Noise Front (0°), Noise Left (270°), and Noise Right (90°) listening conditions. Monaural thresholds were collected for each ear for the Noise Front condition and for the unshadowed ear for the Noise Left and Noise Right conditions. Binaural advantage was determined by subtracting the binaural from the monaural thresholds. Spatial advantage was determined by subtracting the Noise Side from the Noise Front thresholds.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://medone-comsci.thieme.com/ejourn [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=220492
in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) > Vol.29, n°7 (July/August 2018) . - p. 634-647[article]Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA). Vol.29, n°7 (July/August 2018) Périodique papier Ixelles Rez Consultation sur place uniquement
Exclu du prêtA convergent validity study: Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) test and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) / Andrew Vermiglio ; Emery Bulla ; Julia Skinner in International Journal of Audiology IJA, Vol. 60 , n°1 (Janvier 2021)
![]()
[article]
Titre : A convergent validity study: Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) test and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) Type de document : Article Auteurs : Andrew Vermiglio ; Emery Bulla ; Julia Skinner Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p. 27-34 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Bruit ; Evaluation auditive ; Perception de la parole
Autres descripteurs
Mesure comportementaleRésumé : Objectives
The primary purpose of this study was to compare Listening in Spatialized Noise Sentence (LiSN-S) test and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) thresholds in order to determine if the two tests measure the same construct (convergent validity). The secondary purpose was to determine performance differences between the two test protocols. The third purpose was to determine the relationships between quiet measures (pure-tone average [PTA] and HINT Quiet thresholds) vs. speech-in-noise performances.
Design
Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman rho statistic, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear mixed model analyses.
Study sample: Fifty-six young adults with normal PTAs (≤15 dB HL for 0.54.0 kHz) participated in this study.
Results
No statistically significant relationships were found between LiSN-S and HINT measures (poor convergent validity). However, statistically significant relationships were found between the quiet measures (HINT Quiet thresholds and average PTA(0.54.0 kHz)) vs. the LiSN-S (same and different voices) ±90° performances.
Conclusion
LiSN-S performances in two-talker babble cannot be generalized to the ability to recognise HINT sentences in steady-state speech-shaped noise, and vice versa. The results imply that LiSN-S ± 90° thresholds were influenced by hearing sensitivity or by supra-threshold distortions that co-vary with hearing sensitivity.Accès : Contactez la bibliothèque d'Ixelles si le lien vers la ressource électronique ne fonctionne plus Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10 [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=263409
in International Journal of Audiology IJA > Vol. 60 , n°1 (Janvier 2021) . - p. 27-34[article]Sentence recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble / Andrew Vermiglio in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol.30, n° 1 (January 2019)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Sentence recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble Type de document : Article Auteurs : Andrew Vermiglio ; Caroline C. Herring ; Paige Heeke ; Courtney Post ; Xiangming Fang Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 54-65 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Audiologie ; Perception spatiale ; Speech spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ)
Autres descripteurs
Seuil auditif de haute fréquenceRésumé : Speech recognition in noise (SRN) evaluations reveal information about listening ability that is unavailable from pure-tone thresholds. Unfortunately, SRN evaluations are not commonly used in the clinic. A lack of standardization may be an explanation for the lack of widespread acceptance of SRN testing. Arguments have been made for the utilization of steady-state speech-shaped noise vs. multi-talker babble. Previous investigations into the effect of masker type have used a monaural presentation of the stimuli. However, results of monaural SRN tests cannot be generalized to binaural listening conditions.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of masker type on SRN thresholds under binaural listening conditions.Disponible en ligne : Oui En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://medone-comsci.thieme.com/ejourn [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=220521
in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) > Vol.30, n° 1 (January 2019) . - p. 54-65[article]Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA). Vol.30, n°1 (January 2019) Périodique papier Ixelles Rez Consultation sur place uniquement
Exclu du prêtThe Effect of Stimulus Audibility on the Relationship between Pure-Tone Average and Speech Recognition in Noise Ability / Andrew Vermiglio in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol. 31, n° 3 (March 2020)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The Effect of Stimulus Audibility on the Relationship between Pure-Tone Average and Speech Recognition in Noise Ability Type de document : Article Auteurs : Andrew Vermiglio ; Sigfrid D. Soli ; Andrew Vermiglio ; Daniel J. Freed ; Xiangming Fang Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 224-232 Langues : Anglais (eng) Descripteurs : HE Vinci
Audiométrie tonale ; Audition dans le bruit ; Reconnaissance auditive ; Seuil auditifRésumé : The literature presents conflicting reports on the relationship between pure-tone threshold average and speech recognition in noise ability.
The purpose of this retrospective study and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of stimulus audibility on the relationship between speech recognition in noise ability and bilateral pure-tone average (BPTA).Accès : 10.3766/jaaa.19031 Disponible en ligne : Oui/Non En ligne : https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://medone-comsci.thieme.com/ejourn [...] Permalink : https://bib.vinci.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=254386
in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) > Vol. 31, n° 3 (March 2020) . - p. 224-232[article]The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances / Paige Heeke in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA), Vol.29, n° 10 (November/december 2018)
Permalink