Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Evaluative instruments of patients' knowledge about systemic arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus : A scoping review (2023) |
Auteurs : | Clecio André Alves da Silva Maia ; Francisca Diana da Silva Negreiros ; Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 73, November 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | 103838 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103838 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Diabète de type 1 ; Hypertension artérielle ; Soins infirmiers |
Mots-clés: | Instrument d'évaluation ; Évaluation des connaissances des patients |
Résumé : | Aim To map out the evaluative instruments used by nurses to measure the knowledge of patients affected by hypertension and diabetes. Background The construction of evaluative instruments has gained more and more space in Brazil, in nursing, evaluative instruments of knowledge are very relevant, they make it possible to diagnose the knowledge of patients in an area and analyze its evolution over time. Design Scoping review. Methods This is a scope review, guided by the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. To conduct the research, a structured question was created based on the Population strategy (nurses), Concept (instruments for measuring patients' knowledge) and Context (Systemic Arterial Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus). Results Data analysis occurred with the synthesis of selected studies. Out of 1746 articles found in the searched databases, after removing duplication, 1244 articles remained. After reading the abstracts and titles, 955 articles were not included. After reading 289 articles in their entirety, 21 articles were included because they met the established inclusion criteria. We highlight the development of questionnaires with a peer review process and application for validation in the population, knowledge evaluation via previously constructed and internationally validated questionnaires, and cross-cultural adaptation of evaluative questionnaires for different Title Page (with Author Details) realities of the proposal. Conclusions The evidences elucidated that the knowledge measurement questionnaires are valid and constitute a relevant mechanism for evaluating users of health services. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595323003001 |