Login
Communauté Vinci
Extérieur
Si votre nom d'utilisateur ne se termine pas par @vinci.be ou @student.vinci.be, utilisez le formulaire ci-dessous pour accéder à votre compte de lecteur.
Titre : | Are visual assessments of the single-leg squat valid to be used in clinical practice? A systematic review of measurement properties based on the COSMIN guideline (2023) |
Auteurs : | Diogo A. Gomes ; Guilherme V. da Costa ; Eduardo Campos Martins ; Danilo De Oliveira Silva ; Alessandro Haupenthal ; Caroline Ruschel ; Marcelo P. de Castro ; Heiliane de Brito Fontana |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Physical therapy in sport (Vol. 63, Septembre 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 118-125 |
Note générale : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.07.009 |
Langues: | Anglais |
Descripteurs : |
HE Vinci Douleur ; Évaluation de résultat (soins) ; Force musculaire ; Genou ; Hanche ; Phénomènes biomécaniques |
Résumé : | Objective Evaluate the discriminative and convergent validity of visual scales for the assessment of movement quality in the single-leg squat. Methods Searches performed in CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases. Studies evaluating discriminative and convergent validity of movement quality visual assessments in single-leg squats were included. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist was used to assess the risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was assessed by the GRADE modified version. Results Ten studies evaluating three different methods of visual assessment of the single-leg squat (Crossley scale; Whatman score and Medial knee displacement) were included. Very low certainty evidence suggests that the Crossley scale had sufficient discriminative validity for patient-centred outcomes. Very low to moderate certainty evidence suggests that the three visual methods of assessment of the single-leg squat had insufficient discriminative validity for surrogate outcomes and groups. None of the three methods had the convergent validity assessed. Conclusion The Crossley scale exhibited sufficient discriminative validity for patient-centred outcomes, although the evidence supporting this conclusion is of very low certainty. Visual scales for the assessment of the single-leg squat movement quality should be used with caution in clinical practice as most methods had insufficient discriminative validity and no reports of convergent validity. |
Disponible en ligne : | Oui |
En ligne : | https://login.ezproxy.vinci.be/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001001 |
Est accompagné de : |
|